Usage Score
36.7
Player Dossier
2006-2009Rutgers
Tim Brown
WR • 5'8" • Miami, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Tim Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94.4
Consistency
72.6
Season Value
75.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Rutgers
06060707080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tim Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Rutgers. Tim Brown reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Rutgers paired 1,150 primary output with 94.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 75th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Rutgers
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
88.5
Efficiency
94.4
Usage
36.7
Consistency
72.6
Best Game by takeover score
UCF
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCF: 99. Cincinnati: 86. Unknown: 132. Florida International: 131. Maryland: 9. Unknown: 94. Pittsburgh: 96. Army: 101. UConn: 162. South Florida: 49. Syracuse: 67. Louisville: 124. West Virginia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 4 by 100. Cincinnati: 7 by 81.9. Unknown: 3 by 100. Florida International: 4 by 100. Maryland: 1 by 60. Unknown: 6 by 100. Pittsburgh: 7 by 91.4. Army: 4 by 100. UConn: 5 by 100. South Florida: 3 by 100. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Louisville: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins96.4 · n=7 · +34.2 vs Losses
Losses62.3 · n=4 · -34.2 vs Wins
First Half92.4 · n=7 · +8.6 vs Second Half
Second Half83.8 · n=6 · -8.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
100 vs UCF
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/20 | vs UCF | W 45-24 | — | 4 | 99 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs West Virginia | L 21-24 | — | — | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/27 | @ Louisville100 receiving yards | W 34-14 | — | 7 | 124 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Syracuse | L 13-31 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 38 |
| Fri 11/13 | vs South Florida | W 31-0 | — | 3 | 49 | 10.8 | 16.30 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ UConn100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 28-24 | — | 5 | 162 | 28.2 | 32.40 | 2 | 81 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Army100 receiving yards | W 27-10 | — | 4 | 101 | 18.2 | 25.30 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Pittsburgh | L 17-24 | — | 7 | 96 | 12.1 | 13.70 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 94 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Maryland | W 34-13 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Florida International100 receiving yards | W 23-15 | — | 4 | 131 | 32.8 | 32.80 | 0 | 49 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 3 | 132 | 44 | 44 | 1 | 68 |
| Mon 9/7 | vs Cincinnati | L 15-47 | — | 7 | 86 | 8.6 | 12.30 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200620072007200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Rutgers | 202 | 68.3 | 13.7 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Rutgers | 202 | 68.3 | 13.7 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Rutgers | 340 | 80.2 | 13.3 | 138 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Rutgers | 340 | 80.2 | 13.3 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Rutgers | 565 | 79.1 | 14.1 | 225 |
| 2009 Postseason | Rutgers | 1,150 | 94.4 | 36.7 | 585 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rutgers | 1,150 | 94.4 | 36.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Louisville
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124
Primary metric
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UConn
162
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Cincinnati
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas State
101
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Louisville
173
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
173 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Rutgers
1,150 primary output · 94.4 efficiency · 36.7 usage
75.9
#2
2009 Regular Season · Rutgers
75.9
1,150 primary · 94.4 efficiency · 36.7 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Rutgers
44.4
565 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 14.1 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,257
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.