Usage Score
29.6
Player Dossier
2006-2010Louisville
Anthony Allen
RB • 6'0" • Tampa, FL, USA
Workhorse runnerSteady chain mover
Anthony Allen leans workhorse runner traits and 58.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
58.6
Consistency
68
Season Value
64.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Georgia Tech
06060709091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Louisville • Georgia Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Allen, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Georgia Tech. Anthony Allen leans workhorse runner traits and 58.6 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Georgia Tech paired 1,404 primary output with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 58.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Louisville, Georgia Tech.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Georgia Tech
Games
13
Scrimmage Yards / G
108
Efficiency
58.6
Usage
29.6
Consistency
68
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Air Force: 91. Unknown: 28. Kansas: 89. North Carolina: 115. NC State: 85. Wake Forest: 63. Virginia: 195. Middle Tennessee: 75. Clemson: 130. Virginia Tech: 125. Miami: 77. Duke: 165. Georgia: 166
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Air Force: 23 by 41.2. Unknown: 6 by 48.6. Kansas: 11 by 83.7. North Carolina: 20 by 59.9. NC State: 15 by 39.2. Wake Forest: 10 by 65.6. Virginia: 25 by 81.3. Middle Tennessee: 13 by 60.1. Clemson: 19 by 62.3. Virginia Tech: 23 by 56.6. Miami: 15 by 53.5. Duke: 34 by 50.6. Georgia: 29 by 59.6
Split Comparison
Wins122.6 · n=5 · +13.6 vs Losses
Losses109 · n=7 · -13.6 vs Wins
First Half95.1 · n=7 · -27.9 vs Second Half
Second Half123 · n=6 · +27.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
83.7 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/27 | vs Air Force | L 7-14 | 23 | 91 | 4 | 1 | — | — | 4.0 |
| Sun 11/28 | @ Georgia100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | L 34-42 | 29 | 166 | 5.70 | 1 | — | — | 5.7 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Duke100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 30-20 | 34 | 165 | 4.90 | 0 | — | — | 4.9 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Miami | L 10-35 | 15 | 77 | 5.10 | 0 | — | — | 5.1 |
| Thu 11/4 | @ Virginia Tech100 rush yards | L 21-28 | 23 | 125 | 5.40 | 0 | — | — | 5.4 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Clemson | L 13-27 | 17 | 92 | 5.40 | 0 | 2 | 38 | 6.8 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Middle Tennessee2+ TD | W 42-14 | 13 | 75 | 5.80 | 2 | — | — | 5.8 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Virginia100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 33-21 | 25 | 195 | 7.80 | 3 | — | — | 7.8 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Wake Forest | W 24-20 | 10 | 63 | 6.30 | 0 | — | — | 6.3 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs NC State | L 28-45 | 14 | 35 | 2.50 | 0 | 1 | 50 | 5.7 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ North Carolina100 rush yards | W 30-24 | 20 | 115 | 5.80 | 0 | — | — | 5.8 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Kansas | L 25-28 | 11 | 89 | 8.10 | 0 | — | — | 8.1 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 28 | 4.70 | 0 | — | — | 4.7 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Louisville
2006-2007
Opening stop
- 2
Georgia Tech
2009-2010
Final stop
Season Progression
2006200620072009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Louisville | 454 | 44.6 | 15 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Louisville | 454 | 44.6 | 15 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Louisville | 849 | 41.5 | 21.8 | 395 |
| 2009 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 730 | 74.1 | 8.2 | -119 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 730 | 74.1 | 8.2 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 1,404 | 58.6 | 29.6 | 674 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 1,404 | 58.6 | 29.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Middle Tennessee
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
272
Primary metric
272 scrimmage yards and 48.1 usage.
#2
Virginia
195
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
195 scrimmage yards and 32.5 usage.
#3
Clemson
151
Primary metric
Win with 151 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
151 scrimmage yards and 11.5 usage.
#4
Middle Tennessee
70
Primary metric
Win with 70 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
70 scrimmage yards and 14.6 usage.
#5
Duke
165
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
165 scrimmage yards and 53.1 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Georgia Tech
1,404 primary output · 58.6 efficiency · 29.6 usage
64.1
#2
2010 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
64.1
1,404 primary · 58.6 efficiency · 29.6 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Georgia Tech
48.3
730 primary · 74.1 efficiency · 8.2 usage
Milestones
12
100+ rush yards
5
150+ scrimmage yards
10
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
3,437
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.