Usage Score
19.9
Player Dossier
2009-2010Washington State
Jeffrey Solomon
WR • 6'0" • Seattle, WA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jeffrey Solomon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85
Consistency
71.6
Season Value
60.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Washington State
0910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Washington State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeffrey Solomon, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · Washington State. Jeffrey Solomon reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
Washington State paired 236 primary output with 85 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 85 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · Washington State
Games
4
Receiving Yards / G
59
Efficiency
85
Usage
19.9
Consistency
71.6
Best Game by takeover score
Oregon
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. SMU: 76. USC: 42. UCLA: 83. Oregon: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. SMU: 4 by 100. USC: 4 by 70. UCLA: 6 by 92.2. Oregon: 3 by 77.8
Split Comparison
Losses59 · n=4
First Half59 · n=2 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half59 · n=2 · +0 vs First Half
All Games59 · n=4
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UCLA
Best efficiency game
100 vs SMU
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Washington State
2009-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 Regular Season | Washington State | 298 | 67.5 | 15.3 | — |
| 2010 Regular Season | Washington State | 236 | 85 | 19.9 | -62 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
83
Primary metric
83 receiving yards with a 92.2 efficiency score.
#2
SMU
76
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
California
81
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 77.1 efficiency score.
#4
Hawai'i
71
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 78.9 efficiency score.
#5
UCLA
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · Washington State
236 primary output · 85 efficiency · 19.9 usage
60.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · Washington State
49.1
298 primary · 67.5 efficiency · 15.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
534
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.