Usage Score
28
Player Dossier
2006-2009Akron
Andre Jones
WR • 5'11" • Forestville, MD, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Andre Jones reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.5
Consistency
59.4
Season Value
61.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Akron
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Akron
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andre Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Akron. Andre Jones reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Akron paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Akron
Games
8
Receiving Yards / G
69.1
Efficiency
84.5
Usage
28
Consistency
59.4
Best Game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 0. Buffalo: 53. Syracuse: 90. Northern Illinois: 154. Kent State: 93. Temple: 41. Bowling Green: 114. Eastern Michigan: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 4 by 88.3. Syracuse: 3 by 100. Northern Illinois: 6 by 100. Kent State: 6 by 100. Temple: 5 by 54.7. Bowling Green: 8 by 95. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins50.5 · n=2 · -24.8 vs Losses
Losses75.3 · n=6 · +24.8 vs Wins
First Half74.3 · n=4 · +10.3 vs Second Half
Second Half64 · n=4 · -10.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northern Illinois
Best efficiency game
100 vs Kent State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 28-21 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 11/20 | @ Bowling Green100 receiving yards · High volume | L 20-36 | — | 8 | 114 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 1 | 34 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Temple | L 17-56 | — | 5 | 41 | 9.8 | 8.20 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Kent State | W 28-20 | — | 6 | 93 | 11.2 | 15.50 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Northern Illinois100 receiving yards | L 10-27 | — | 6 | 154 | 25.7 | 25.70 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Syracuse | L 14-28 | — | 3 | 90 | 19.6 | 30 | 1 | 46 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Buffalo | L 17-21 | — | 4 | 53 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Ohio | L 7-19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Akron
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Akron | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Akron | 678 | 79.9 | 26 | 678 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Akron | 553 | 84.5 | 28 | -125 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northern Illinois
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
154
Primary metric
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Army
100
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
100 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Syracuse
98
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#5
Buffalo
99
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99 receiving yards with a 82.5 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Akron
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2007 Regular Season · Akron
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Akron
66.6
678 primary · 79.9 efficiency · 26 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,231
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.