Usage Score
16
Player Dossier
2007-2010Tennessee
Luke Stocker
TE • 6'6" • Berea, KY, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Luke Stocker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
61.5
Consistency
66.1
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Tennessee
070809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Tennessee
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kentucky
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Luke Stocker, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Tennessee. Luke Stocker reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Tennessee paired 389 primary output with 74.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 61.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Tennessee
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
32.1
Efficiency
61.5
Usage
16
Consistency
66.1
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 58. Unknown: 17. Oregon: 2. Florida: 41. UAB: 56. LSU: 16. Georgia: 36. Alabama: 26. South Carolina: 16. Memphis: 56. Ole Miss: 40. Vanderbilt: -2. Kentucky: 55
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 5 by 77.3. Unknown: 2 by 56.7. Oregon: 1 by 13.3. Florida: 5 by 54.7. UAB: 4 by 93.3. LSU: 2 by 53.3. Georgia: 2 by 100. Alabama: 3 by 57.8. South Carolina: 2 by 53.3. Memphis: 3 by 100. Ole Miss: 4 by 66.7. Vanderbilt: 1 by 0. Kentucky: 5 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins41 · Games = 5 · +13.1 vs Losses
Losses27.9 · Games = 7 · -13.1 vs Wins
First Half32.3 · Games = 7 · +0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half31.8 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Memphis
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/30 | vs North Carolina | L 27-30 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Kentucky | W 24-14 | — | 5 | 55 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/21 | @ Vanderbilt | W 24-10 | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Ole Miss | W 52-14 | — | 4 | 40 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/7 | @ Memphis | W 50-14 | — | 3 | 56 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ South Carolina | L 24-38 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Alabama | L 10-41 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ Georgia | L 14-41 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ LSU | L 14-16 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs UAB | W 32-29 | — | 4 | 56 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Florida | L 17-31 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Oregon | L 13-48 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tennessee
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Tennessee | 11 | 18.4 | 4.3 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tennessee | 139 | 66.2 | 9.8 | 128 |
| 2009 Postseason | Tennessee | 389 | 74.3 | 16.4 | 250 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Tennessee | 389 | 74.3 | 16.4 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Tennessee | 417 | 61.5 | 16 | 28 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Tennessee | 417 | 61.5 | 16 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78
Primary metric
78 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Alabama
30
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
30 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
56
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
56 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Georgia
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Tennessee
389 primary output · 74.3 efficiency · 16.4 usage
64.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Tennessee
64.3
389 primary · 74.3 efficiency · 16.4 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · Tennessee
60.9
417 primary · 61.5 efficiency · 16 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.8711
Madison Southern · Berea, KY
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
956
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.