Usage Score
9.8
Player Dossier
2006-2008Temple
Dy'Onne Crudup
WR • 5'9" • 175 lbs • New Haven, CT, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Dy'Onne Crudup reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.1
Consistency
66.6
Season Value
54
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Temple
060708
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dy'Onne Crudup, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Temple. Dy'Onne Crudup reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Temple paired 348 primary output with 64.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2008 Regular Season · Temple
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
83.1
Usage
9.8
Consistency
66.6
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 20. UConn: 4. Buffalo: 41. Western Michigan: 21. Miami (OH): 27. Central Michigan: 12. Navy: 13. Eastern Michigan: 47. Akron: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Army: 1 by 100. UConn: 1 by 26.7. Buffalo: 5 by 54.7. Western Michigan: 1 by 100. Miami (OH): 1 by 100. Central Michigan: 1 by 80. Navy: 1 by 86.7. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Akron: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins30.8 · n=4 · +12.6 vs Losses
Losses18.2 · n=5 · -12.6 vs Wins
First Half22.6 · n=5 · -2.6 vs Second Half
Second Half25.3 · n=4 · +2.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Akron
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Akron | W 27-6 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 55-52 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Navy | L 27-33 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-24 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Miami (OH) | W 28-10 | — | 1 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Western Michigan | L 3-7 | — | 1 | 21 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Buffalo | L 28-30 | — | 5 | 41 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UConn | L 9-12 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Army | W 35-7 | — | 1 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 20 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072008
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 16 | 53.3 | 4.5 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Temple | 348 | 64.8 | 20.1 | 332 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Temple | 214 | 83.1 | 9.8 | -134 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85
Primary metric
85 receiving yards with a 81 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
47
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
47 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
74
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
74 receiving yards with a 61.7 efficiency score.
#4
Akron
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami (OH)
27
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Temple
348 primary output · 64.8 efficiency · 20.1 usage
57.6
#2
2008 Regular Season · Temple
54
214 primary · 83.1 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Temple
40.5
16 primary · 53.3 efficiency · 4.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
578
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.