Usage Score
15.3
Player Dossier
2007-2010UAB
Mike Jones
WR • 6'1" • Nashville, TN, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mike Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
79
Consistency
57.7
Season Value
63
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UAB
07080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mike Jones, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UAB. Mike Jones reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
UAB paired 531 primary output with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 79 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2010 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · UAB
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
44.3
Efficiency
79
Usage
15.3
Consistency
57.7
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 17. SMU: 36. Troy: 60. Tennessee: 58. UCF: 26. UTEP: 7. Mississippi State: 66. Southern Miss: 86. Marshall: 11. East Carolina: 110. Memphis: 15. Rice: 39
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 56.7. SMU: 2 by 100. Troy: 3 by 100. Tennessee: 2 by 100. UCF: 3 by 57.8. UTEP: 1 by 46.7. Mississippi State: 4 by 100. Southern Miss: 8 by 71.7. Marshall: 1 by 73.3. East Carolina: 8 by 91.7. Memphis: 2 by 50. Rice: 2 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins42 · n=4 · -3.4 vs Losses
Losses45.4 · n=8 · +3.4 vs Wins
First Half34 · n=6 · -20.5 vs Second Half
Second Half54.5 · n=6 · +20.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
East Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/27 | @ Rice | L 23-28 | — | 2 | 39 | 19.5 | 19.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Memphis | W 31-15 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Fri 11/12 | vs East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 42-54 | — | 8 | 110 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Marshall | L 17-31 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 1 | 11 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Southern MissHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 50-49 | — | 8 | 86 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 3 | 20 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Mississippi State | L 24-29 | — | 4 | 66 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UTEP | W 21-6 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 10/7 | @ UCF | L 7-42 | — | 3 | 26 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Tennessee | L 29-32 | — | 2 | 58 | 15.7 | 29 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Troy | W 34-33 | — | 3 | 60 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ SMU | L 7-28 | — | 2 | 36 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 32 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 31-32 | — | 2 | 17 | 6.7 | 8.50 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UAB | 122 | 51.2 | 11.1 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 109 | 56.7 | 9.2 | -13 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 85 | 76 | 9.1 | -24 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 531 | 79 | 15.3 | 446 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
East Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
110
Primary metric
110 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
35
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Memphis
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
58
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58 receiving yards with a 77.3 efficiency score.
#5
Southern Miss
86
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
86 receiving yards with a 71.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · UAB
531 primary output · 79 efficiency · 15.3 usage
63
#2
2009 Regular Season · UAB
39.6
85 primary · 76 efficiency · 9.1 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UAB
35.7
109 primary · 56.7 efficiency · 9.2 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
847
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.