Usage Score
21.4
Player Dossier
2007-2010UAB
Frantrell Forrest
WR • 6'2" • Mobile, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Frantrell Forrest reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.5
Consistency
74.8
Season Value
66.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UAB
07080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Frantrell Forrest, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season · UAB. Frantrell Forrest reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Regular Season
UAB paired 558 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tennessee
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · UAB
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
62
Efficiency
83.5
Usage
21.4
Consistency
74.8
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 10. SMU: 71. Troy: 71. Tennessee: 109. UCF: 4. UTEP: 99. Mississippi State: 58. Southern Miss: 67. Marshall: 69
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 66.7. SMU: 5 by 94.7. Troy: 4 by 100. Tennessee: 7 by 100. UCF: 1 by 26.7. UTEP: 7 by 94.3. Mississippi State: 5 by 77.3. Southern Miss: 4 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 92
Split Comparison
Wins79 · n=3 · +25.5 vs Losses
Losses53.5 · n=6 · -25.5 vs Wins
First Half53 · n=5 · -20.3 vs Second Half
Second Half73.3 · n=4 · +20.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tennessee
Best efficiency game
100 vs Southern Miss
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/6 | vs Marshall | L 17-31 | — | 5 | 69 | 11.3 | 13.80 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Southern Miss | W 50-49 | — | 4 | 67 | 11.1 | 16.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Mississippi State | L 24-29 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UTEP2+ TD | W 21-6 | — | 7 | 99 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 2 | 28 |
| Thu 10/7 | @ UCF | L 7-42 | — | 1 | 4 | 5.5 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Tennessee100 receiving yards | L 29-32 | — | 7 | 109 | 14.4 | 15.60 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Troy | W 34-33 | — | 4 | 71 | 17.8 | 17.80 | 1 | 33 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ SMU | L 7-28 | — | 5 | 71 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 51 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 31-32 | — | 1 | 10 | 2.7 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UAB
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2007200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UAB | 563 | 64.7 | 23.5 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 536 | 86.6 | 23.8 | -27 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 558 | 81.6 | 21.2 | 22 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 558 | 83.5 | 21.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
122
Primary metric
122 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Memphis
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Florida Atlantic
149
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
149 receiving yards with a 90.3 efficiency score.
#4
Tennessee
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Houston
96
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Regular Season · UAB
558 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 21.4 usage
66.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · UAB
63.3
558 primary · 81.6 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UAB
59.9
536 primary · 86.6 efficiency · 23.8 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,215
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.