Usage Score
6
Player Dossier
2007-2009Arkansas
Carlton Salters
WR • 5'11" • Tallahassee, FL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Carlton Salters reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80
Consistency
37.8
Season Value
55.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Arkansas
070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Arkansas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carlton Salters, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Arkansas. Carlton Salters reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Arkansas paired 81 primary output with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Arkansas
Games
3
Receiving Yards / G
27
Efficiency
80
Usage
6
Consistency
37.8
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 58. Eastern Michigan: 6. Troy: 17
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 1 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 1 by 40. Troy: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins11.5 · n=2
First Half32 · n=2
All Games27 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
100 vs Troy
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Arkansas
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Arkansas | 38 | 63.3 | 7 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Arkansas | 66 | 65.8 | 7.7 | 28 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Arkansas | 81 | 80 | 6 | 15 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Ole Miss
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
58
Primary metric
58 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Kentucky
15
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
15 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
LSU
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 96.7 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
24
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
11
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Arkansas
81 primary output · 80 efficiency · 6 usage
55.3
#2
2008 Regular Season · Arkansas
53.7
66 primary · 65.8 efficiency · 7.7 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Arkansas
46.1
38 primary · 63.3 efficiency · 7 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8006
Norview · Norfolk, VA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
185
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.