Usage Score
11.7
Player Dossier
2006-2010UTEP
QB • 5'11" • Palestine, TX, USA
James Thomas II is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
11.7
Efficiency
46.3
Consistency
27.9
Season Value
35.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
James Thomas II, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · UTEP. James Thomas II is a balanced quarterback profile with 11.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
James Thomas II played QB for UTEP. Across 5 tracked seasons, James Thomas II recorded 281 passing yards, 630 rushing yards, and 301 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2008 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
UTEP paired 485 primary output with 59.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 46.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with 87 yards of offense and 88.1 efficiency. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
26.6
Efficiency
46.3
Usage
11.7
Consistency
27.9
Best Game by takeover score
BYU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 10. Unknown: 6. Houston: 0. New Mexico State: 55. Memphis: 0. New Mexico: 1. Rice: 5. UAB: 1. Tulane: 37. Marshall: 29. SMU: 34. Arkansas: 81. Tulsa: 87
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 7 by 31.3. Unknown: 2 by 30. New Mexico State: 5 by 50. New Mexico: 1 by 10. Rice: 1 by 50. UAB: 1 by 10. Tulane: 9 by 40.4. Marshall: 7 by 41.4. SMU: 5 by 85. Arkansas: 8 by 73.3. Tulsa: 10 by 88.1
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
88.1 vs Tulsa
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs BYU | L 24-52 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 31.3 | 4 | 10 | 2.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulsa | L 28-31 | 1 | 1 | 40 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 88.1 | 9 | 47 | 5.20 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas | L 21-58 | 4 | 5 | 77 | 80.0 | 1 | 0 | 73.3 | 3 | 4 | 1.30 | 0 | 3 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU | W 28-14 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | 85 | 4 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 41.4 | 7 | 29 | 4.10 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Tulane | L 24-34 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 40.4 | 6 | 37 | 6.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Rice | W 44-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico | W 38-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Memphis | W 16-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico StateDual-threat | W 42-10 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 3 | 55 | 18.30 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston | L 24-54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2006-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | UTEP | 22 | 35.8 | 11 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 0 | — | — | -22 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 485 | 59.6 | 14.1 | 485 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 58 | 45.6 | 5.9 | -427 |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 346 | 46.3 | 11.7 | 288 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 346 | 46.3 | 11.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with 87 yards of offense and 88.1 efficiency.
87
Primary metric
87 total offense with 88.1 efficiency.
#2
Marshall
13
Primary metric
Loss with 13 yards of offense and 100 efficiency.
13 total offense with 100 efficiency.
#3
New Mexico State
202
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
202 total offense with 65.4 efficiency.
#4
Buffalo
19
Primary metric
Loss with 19 yards of offense and 95 efficiency.
19 total offense with 95 efficiency.
#5
Arkansas
81
Primary metric
Loss with 81 yards of offense and 73.3 efficiency.
81 total offense with 73.3 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
485 primary output · 59.6 efficiency · 14.1 usage
46.6
#2
2010 Postseason · UTEP
35.5
346 primary · 46.3 efficiency · 11.7 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
35.5
346 primary · 46.3 efficiency · 11.7 usage
0
250+ passing yards
0
300+ total offense
1
3+ takeover TD games
13
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7667
Fort Bend Marshall · Missouri City, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
911
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.