Usage / Role
22%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2007-2010UTEP
WR • 6'3" • Fort Worth, TX, USA
Kris Adams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
22%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
100
Top-tier box-score impact for a receiver
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
Star Power
85
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · UTEP
Snapshot
Player Story
Kris Adams built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a wide receiver from Fort Worth, TX wearing No. 2, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Kris Adams' career was his receiving role: 144 catches,...
Read the storyKris Adams, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2010 Postseason · UTEP. Kris Adams reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 4 | 5 | 49 | 0 | 31.5 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 50 | 958 | 14 | 77.6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 12 | 42 | 580 | 2 | 63.3 |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 13 | 3 | 153 | 3 | 81.6 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 13 | 44 | 917 | 11 | 81.6 |
Related Context
Kris Adams played WR for UTEP. Across 4 tracked seasons, Kris Adams recorded 2,657 receiving yards and 30 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with UTEP.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
UTEP paired 1,070 primary output with 94.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arkansas
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
82.3
Efficiency
94.7
Usage
20
Consistency
65
Best Game by takeover score
Arkansas
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. BYU: 153. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 48. Houston: 114. New Mexico State: 86. Memphis: 30. New Mexico: 141. Rice: 134. UAB: 44. Tulane: 28. Marshall: 82. SMU: 36. Arkansas: 148. Tulsa: 26
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 3 by 100. Arkansas-Pine Bluff: 2 by 100. Houston: 7 by 100. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Memphis: 1 by 100. New Mexico: 5 by 100. Rice: 5 by 100. UAB: 4 by 73.3. Tulane: 1 by 100. Marshall: 6 by 91.1. SMU: 3 by 80. Arkansas: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 2 by 86.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arkansas
Best efficiency game
100 vs BYU
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | vs BYU100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 24-52 | — | 3 | 153 | 51 | 51 | 3 | 67 |
| Sat 11/20 | @ Tulsa | L 28-31 | — | 2 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 11/14 | @ Arkansas100 receiving yards | L 21-58 | — | 5 | 148 | 29.6 | 29.60 | 1 | 60 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs SMU | W 28-14 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Marshall | L 12-16 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 10/24 | vs Tulane | L 24-34 | — | 1 | 28 | 28 | 28 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/16 | @ UAB | L 6-21 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 10/10 | vs Rice100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 44-24 | — | 5 | 134 | 26.8 | 26.80 | 3 | 73 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 38-20 | — | 5 | 141 | 28.2 | 28.20 | 2 | 49 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Memphis | W 16-13 | — | 1 | 30 | 30 | 30 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 9/19 | vs New Mexico State2+ TD | W 42-10 | — | 3 | 86 | 28.7 | 28.70 | 2 | 68 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Houston100 receiving yards | L 24-54 | — | 7 | 114 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Arkansas-Pine Bluff | W 31-10 | — | 2 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 36 |
Player Story
Kris Adams built his college career from 2007 through 2010 as a wide receiver from Fort Worth, TX wearing No. 2, spending time with UTEP. The clearest part of Kris Adams' career was his receiving role: 144 catches, 2,657 receiving yards, and 30 touchdowns across 41 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2010 with UTEP. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. With 41 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across UTEP.
The arc is straightforward: Kris Adams moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 49 | 58.3 | 5.2 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 958 | 87.4 | 19.3 | 909 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 580 | 75.8 | 17.8 | -378 |
| 2010 Postseason | UTEP | 1,070 | 94.7 | 20 | 490 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UTEP | 1,070 | 94.7 | 20 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Arkansas
Week 11 · L 21-58
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
148
Receiving Yards
96.5 takeover
148 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs SMU
Week 12 · W 36-10 · Conference game
145
Receiving Yards
93.1 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Rice
Week 6 · W 44-24 · Conference game
134
Receiving Yards
91.8 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Buffalo
Week 1 · L 17-23
98
Receiving Yards
90.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
98 receiving yards with a 72.6 efficiency score.
#5
@ New Mexico
Week 5 · W 38-20
141
Receiving Yards
90.5 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
141 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2010 Postseason · UTEP
1,070 primary output · 94.7 efficiency · 20 usage
81.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · UTEP
81.6
1,070 primary · 94.7 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
77.6
958 primary · 87.4 efficiency · 19.3 usage
10
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
8
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.