Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2009Tulsa
Dexter Taylor
DB • 5'9" • Indianpolis, IN, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Dexter Taylor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 0 disruption score.
Efficiency
0
Consistency
100
Season Value
50
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
060809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 3
- Program Path
- Tulsa • Western Kentucky
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dexter Taylor, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tulsa. Dexter Taylor shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 0 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Tulsa, Western Kentucky.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
Games
3
Havoc Plays / G
0
Efficiency
0
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 0. Louisiana: 0. Middle Tennessee: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Losses0 · n=3
First Half0 · n=2
All Games0 · n=3
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
3 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
0 vs Middle Tennessee
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2006
Opening stop
- 2
Western Kentucky
2008-2009
Final stop
Season Progression
200620082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulsa | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Western Kentucky | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0
Primary metric
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#2
Houston
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#3
UTEP
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#4
Memphis
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
#5
East Carolina
0
Primary metric
Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 0 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2008 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Western Kentucky
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.