Usage Score
17.1
Player Dossier
2008-2010Northwestern
Sidney Stewart
WR • 6'1" • Farmington Hills, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Sidney Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
75.8
Consistency
65.6
Season Value
64.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Northwestern
0809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Northwestern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sidney Stewart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Northwestern. Sidney Stewart reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Northwestern paired 454 primary output with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Northwestern
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
37.8
Efficiency
75.8
Usage
17.1
Consistency
65.6
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 17. Vanderbilt: 30. Unknown: 51. Rice: 45. Central Michigan: 57. Minnesota: 35. Purdue: 20. Michigan State: 82. Indiana: 10. Iowa: 46. Illinois: 32. Wisconsin: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 2 by 56.7. Vanderbilt: 2 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 85. Rice: 3 by 100. Central Michigan: 5 by 76. Minnesota: 4 by 58.3. Purdue: 2 by 66.7. Michigan State: 6 by 91.1. Indiana: 1 by 66.7. Iowa: 5 by 61.3. Illinois: 2 by 100. Wisconsin: 4 by 48.3
Split Comparison
Wins37.2 · n=6 · +1.2 vs Losses
Losses36 · n=5 · -1.2 vs Wins
First Half39.2 · n=6 · +2.7 vs Second Half
Second Half36.5 · n=6 · -2.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Michigan State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 1/1 | @ Texas Tech | L 38-45 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Wisconsin | L 23-70 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs Illinois | L 27-48 | — | 2 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Iowa | W 21-17 | — | 5 | 46 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Indiana | W 20-17 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Michigan State | L 27-35 | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/9 | vs Purdue | L 17-20 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/2 | @ Minnesota | W 29-28 | — | 4 | 35 | 8.8 | 8.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Central Michigan | W 30-25 | — | 5 | 57 | 11.4 | 11.40 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Rice | W 30-13 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/11 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 51 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/4 | @ Vanderbilt | W 23-21 | — | 2 | 30 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 23 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northwestern
2008-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
20082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | Northwestern | 134 | 49 | 8.9 | — |
| 2009 Postseason | Northwestern | 470 | 72.5 | 16 | 336 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Northwestern | 470 | 72.5 | 16 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | Northwestern | 454 | 75.8 | 17.1 | -16 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Northwestern | 454 | 75.8 | 17.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
82
Primary metric
82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
94
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
97
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 64.7 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
49
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
49 receiving yards with a 46.7 efficiency score.
#5
Rice
45
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Northwestern
454 primary output · 75.8 efficiency · 17.1 usage
64.6
#2
2010 Regular Season · Northwestern
64.6
454 primary · 75.8 efficiency · 17.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Northwestern
63.2
470 primary · 72.5 efficiency · 16 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7978
Harrison · Farmington, MI
- Committed To
- Northwestern
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,058
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.