Usage Score
9.3
Player Dossier
2006-2010Troy
Justin Brooks
RB • 5'11" • Dothan, AL, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Justin Brooks leans balanced backfield option traits and 31.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
31.8
Consistency
27.9
Season Value
32.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · UAB
06080910
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 2
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Troy • UAB
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Brooks, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · UAB. Justin Brooks leans balanced backfield option traits and 31.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
UAB paired 319 primary output with 49.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 31.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2010 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Troy, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Regular Season · UAB
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
21.8
Efficiency
31.8
Usage
9.3
Consistency
27.9
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida Atlantic: 50. SMU: 9. Troy: 12. Tennessee: -1. UCF: 1. UTEP: 81. Mississippi State: 32. Marshall: 11. East Carolina: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida Atlantic: 10 by 45.1. SMU: 5 by 18.8. Troy: 3 by 38.5. Tennessee: 3 by 0. UCF: 1 by 10.4. UTEP: 13 by 64.9. Mississippi State: 7 by 48.2. Marshall: 3 by 49.7. East Carolina: 1 by 10.4
Split Comparison
Wins46.5 · n=2 · +31.8 vs Losses
Losses14.7 · n=7 · -31.8 vs Wins
First Half14.2 · n=5 · -17.1 vs Second Half
Second Half31.3 · n=4 · +17.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
64.9 vs UTEP
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/12 | vs East Carolina | L 42-54 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs Marshall | L 17-31 | 2 | 11 | 5.50 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Mississippi State | L 24-29 | 6 | 28 | 4.70 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4.6 |
| Sat 10/16 | vs UTEP | W 21-6 | 13 | 81 | 6.20 | 0 | — | — | 6.2 |
| Thu 10/7 | @ UCF | L 7-42 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 9/25 | @ Tennessee | L 29-32 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -1 | -0.3 |
| Sat 9/18 | vs Troy | W 34-33 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ SMU | L 7-28 | 5 | 9 | 1.80 | 0 | — | — | 1.8 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs Florida Atlantic | L 31-32 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | 2 | 19 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Troy
2006
Opening stop
- 2
UAB
2008-2010
Final stop
Season Progression
2006200820092010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Troy | 76 | 28.7 | 8.1 | — |
| 2008 Regular Season | UAB | 319 | 49.1 | 13.2 | 243 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UAB | 212 | 51.4 | 10.5 | -107 |
| 2010 Regular Season | UAB | 196 | 31.8 | 9.3 | -16 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with 77 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
77
Primary metric
77 scrimmage yards and 18.3 usage.
#2
UTEP
81
Primary metric
Win with 81 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
81 scrimmage yards and 21.7 usage.
#3
Ole Miss
48
Primary metric
Loss with 48 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
48 scrimmage yards and 13.5 usage.
#4
UL Monroe
64
Primary metric
Win with 64 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
64 scrimmage yards and 18 usage.
#5
Unknown
45
Primary metric
Game with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
45 scrimmage yards and 7.8 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · UAB
319 primary output · 49.1 efficiency · 13.2 usage
52.4
#2
2009 Regular Season · UAB
47.3
212 primary · 51.4 efficiency · 10.5 usage
#3
2010 Regular Season · UAB
32.4
196 primary · 31.8 efficiency · 9.3 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
803
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.