Player Dossier

2007-2009

Middle Tennessee

Patrick Honeycutt

WR • 5'9" • Pelham, AL, USA

Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher

Patrick Honeycutt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Usage Score

17.8

Efficiency

70.3

Consistency

64.9

Season Value

57.1

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee

07080909

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
4
Program Path
Middle Tennessee
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Patrick Honeycutt, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee. Patrick Honeycutt reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Middle Tennessee paired 420 primary output with 70.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 70.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Memphis

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee

Games

12

Receiving Yards / G

35

Efficiency

70.3

Usage

17.8

Consistency

64.9

Best Game by takeover score

Southern Miss

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Game-by-Game Trend

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 9. Clemson: 17. Memphis: 71. Maryland: 57. North Texas: 9. Troy: 66. Western Kentucky: 49. Florida Atlantic: 6. Florida International: 32. Louisiana: 42. Arkansas State: 17. UL Monroe: 45

Volume vs Efficiency

Low volume / high quality

High volume / high quality

Low volume / lower quality

High volume / lower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 1 by 60. Clemson: 4 by 28.3. Memphis: 5 by 94.7. Maryland: 5 by 76. North Texas: 1 by 60. Troy: 5 by 88. Western Kentucky: 3 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 40. Florida International: 3 by 71.1. Louisiana: 3 by 93.3. Arkansas State: 2 by 56.7. UL Monroe: 4 by 75

Split Comparison

Wins33.7 · n=10 · -7.8 vs Losses
Losses41.5 · n=2 · +7.8 vs Wins
First Half38.2 · n=6 · +6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half31.8 · n=6 · -6.3 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

12 games

Featured metric

Receiving Yards

Top game by takeover score

Memphis

Best efficiency game

100 vs Western Kentucky

Result
Mon 12/21vs Southern MissW 42-32199909
Sat 11/28@ UL MonroeW 38-1944511.311.30122
Sat 11/21vs Arkansas StateW 38-142178.58.50010
Sat 11/14vs LouisianaW 34-173421414118
Sat 11/7vs Florida InternationalW 48-2133210.710.70112
Sat 10/31@ Florida AtlanticW 27-20166606
Sat 10/24vs Western KentuckyW 62-2434916.316.30017
Wed 10/7@ TroyL 7-3156613.213.20019
Sat 9/26@ North TexasW 37-21199909
Sat 9/19@ MarylandW 32-3155711.411.40017
Sat 9/12vs MemphisW 31-1457114.214.20124
Sat 9/5@ ClemsonL 14-374174.34.3007

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Middle Tennessee

    2007-2009

    Opening stop

Season Progression

2007200820092009
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2007 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee32863.516.9
2008 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee51360.522.2185
2009 PostseasonMiddle Tennessee42070.317.8-93
2009 Regular SeasonMiddle Tennessee42070.317.80

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Florida Atlantic

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

113

Primary metric

113 receiving yards with a 83.7 efficiency score.

#2

Memphis

71

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

71 receiving yards with a 94.7 efficiency score.

#3

Louisville

87

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.

#4

North Texas

91

Primary metric

Win with an explosive receiving profile.

91 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.

#5

Troy

66

Primary metric

Loss with an explosive receiving profile.

66 receiving yards with a 88 efficiency score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2009 Postseason · Middle Tennessee

420 primary output · 70.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage

57.1

#2

2009 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee

57.1

420 primary · 70.3 efficiency · 17.8 usage

#3

2008 Regular Season · Middle Tennessee

54.5

513 primary · 60.5 efficiency · 22.2 usage

Milestones

1

100+ receiving yards

2

8+ catch outings

0

2+ TD games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit context is not available for this player in the current dataset.

Career Facts

1

Career teams

4

Seasons tracked

1,261

Career Receiving Yards

Data Context

Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.

Quick Answers

Patrick Honeycutt quick answers

Position
WR
Teams played for
1
Seasons tracked
4
Career receiving yards
1,261