Usage Score
16.6
Player Dossier
2006-2009Temple
Jason Harper
WR • 5'9" • Budd Lake, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jason Harper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
84.3
Consistency
41.9
Season Value
43.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Temple
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Kent State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jason Harper, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Temple. Jason Harper reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Temple paired 571 primary output with 78.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 84.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Temple
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
25.3
Efficiency
84.3
Usage
16.6
Consistency
41.9
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 27. Penn State: 20. Eastern Michigan: 83. Ball State: 8. Army: 42. Toledo: 36. Navy: 12. Akron: 0. Ohio: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 90. Penn State: 2 by 66.7. Eastern Michigan: 3 by 100. Ball State: 1 by 53.3. Army: 2 by 100. Toledo: 1 by 100. Navy: 1 by 80
Split Comparison
Wins30.2 · n=6 · +20.2 vs Losses
Losses10 · n=2 · -20.2 vs Wins
First Half36 · n=5 · +24 vs Second Half
Second Half12 · n=4 · -24 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Ohio | L 17-35 | — | — | — | 0.5 | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Akron | W 56-17 | — | — | — | 27 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Navy | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Toledo | W 40-24 | — | 1 | 36 | 36 | 36 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Army | W 27-13 | — | 2 | 42 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Ball State | W 24-19 | — | 1 | 8 | 9.3 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 24-12 | — | 3 | 83 | 20 | 27.70 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Penn State | L 6-31 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 11 |
| Thu 9/3 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 19 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 99 | 41.4 | 10.9 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Temple | 226 | 69.2 | 13 | 127 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Temple | 571 | 78.8 | 23.3 | 345 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Temple | 228 | 84.3 | 16.6 | -343 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Kent State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
209
Primary metric
209 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Eastern Michigan
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Louisville
67
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
67 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Akron
115
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Temple
571 primary output · 78.8 efficiency · 23.3 usage
53.4
#2
2007 Regular Season · Temple
45.1
226 primary · 69.2 efficiency · 13 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Temple
43.2
228 primary · 84.3 efficiency · 16.6 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
1,124
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.