Usage Score
4.6
Player Dossier
2006-2010Troy
Jonathan Chandler
WR • 6'0" • Opelika, AL, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jonathan Chandler reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
83.3
Consistency
42.3
Season Value
47.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Postseason · Troy
06060708091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Troy
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Chandler, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Postseason · Troy. Jonathan Chandler reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Postseason
Troy paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Troy
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
7.8
Efficiency
83.3
Usage
4.6
Consistency
42.3
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ohio: 12. Bowling Green: 12. UAB: 19. Louisiana: 0. UL Monroe: 0. North Texas: 0. Florida International: 0. South Carolina: 17. Western Kentucky: 0. Florida Atlantic: 18
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ohio: 1 by 80. Bowling Green: 1 by 80. UAB: 1 by 100. South Carolina: 2 by 56.7. Florida Atlantic: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins7 · n=6 · -2 vs Losses
Losses9 · n=4 · +2 vs Wins
First Half8.6 · n=5 · +1.6 vs Second Half
Second Half7 · n=5 · -1.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida Atlantic
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/19 | vs Ohio | W 48-21 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/4 | @ Florida Atlantic | W 44-7 | — | 1 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/27 | vs Western Kentucky | W 28-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/20 | @ South Carolina | L 24-69 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/13 | vs Florida International | L 35-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/6 | @ North Texas | W 41-35 | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/30 | @ UL Monroe | L 14-28 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/16 | vs Louisiana | W 31-24 | — | — | — | 3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/18 | @ UAB | L 33-34 | — | 1 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Bowling Green | W 30-27 | — | 1 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Troy
2006-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200620072008200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Troy | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Troy | 12 | 80 | 2.7 | 12 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Troy | 0 | — | — | -12 |
| 2010 Postseason | Troy | 78 | 83.3 | 4.6 | 78 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Troy | 78 | 83.3 | 4.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UAB
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
19
Primary metric
19 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
12
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#4
South Carolina
17
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
17 receiving yards with a 56.7 efficiency score.
#5
Bowling Green
12
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
12 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Postseason · Troy
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2006 Regular Season · Troy
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Troy
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
90
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.