Usage Score
22.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009UTEP
Jeff Moturi
WR • 6'0" • Irving, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jeff Moturi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.1
Consistency
45.6
Season Value
60.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · UTEP
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- UTEP
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeff Moturi, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · UTEP. Jeff Moturi reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
UTEP paired 855 primary output with 76.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Marshall
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · UTEP
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
81.2
Efficiency
80.1
Usage
22.4
Consistency
45.6
Best Game by takeover score
Marshall
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 38. Kansas: 14. New Mexico State: 54. Texas: 9. Houston: 127. Memphis: 118. Tulsa: 37. UAB: 161. Tulane: 27. SMU: 153. Rice: 57. Marshall: 179
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Buffalo: 6 by 42.2. Kansas: 2 by 46.7. New Mexico State: 4 by 90. Texas: 1 by 60. Houston: 6 by 100. Memphis: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 4 by 61.7. UAB: 7 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 60. SMU: 5 by 100. Rice: 3 by 100. Marshall: 7 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins99.3 · n=4 · +27.1 vs Losses
Losses72.1 · n=8 · -27.1 vs Wins
First Half60 · n=6 · -42.3 vs Second Half
Second Half102.3 · n=6 · +42.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Marshall
Best efficiency game
100 vs Marshall
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/28 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards | W 52-21 | — | 7 | 179 | 25.6 | 25.60 | 1 | 80 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Rice | L 29-30 | — | 3 | 57 | 16.5 | 19 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ SMU100 receiving yards | L 31-35 | — | 5 | 153 | 30.6 | 30.60 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Tulane | L 38-45 | — | 3 | 27 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs UAB100 receiving yards | L 33-38 | — | 7 | 161 | 23 | 23 | 0 | 51 |
| Thu 10/22 | vs Tulsa | W 28-24 | — | 4 | 37 | 9 | 9.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards | L 20-35 | — | 5 | 118 | 23.6 | 23.60 | 1 | 56 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Houston100 receiving yards | W 58-41 | — | 6 | 127 | 18.4 | 21.20 | 1 | 74 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Texas | L 7-64 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sun 9/20 | @ New Mexico State | W 38-12 | — | 4 | 54 | 10.8 | 13.50 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Kansas | L 7-34 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Buffalo | L 17-23 | — | 6 | 38 | 8.4 | 6.30 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
UTEP
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | UTEP | 7 | 46.7 | 6.7 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 855 | 76.2 | 28.7 | 848 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 655 | 69.1 | 19.3 | -200 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UTEP | 974 | 80.1 | 22.4 | 319 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
174
Primary metric
174 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
109
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Marshall
179
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
179 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UAB
161
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
161 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
SMU
153
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
153 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · UTEP
855 primary output · 76.2 efficiency · 28.7 usage
61.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · UTEP
60.3
974 primary · 80.1 efficiency · 22.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
54.3
655 primary · 69.1 efficiency · 19.3 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
2,491
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.