Usage Score
27
Player Profile
Jacoby Ford
WR • 5'10" • Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jacoby Ford reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80.7
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Clemson
06060708080909
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Primary stop by seasons
- Clemson
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Clemson
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Jacoby Ford, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Clemson. Jacoby Ford reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Clemson paired 779 primary output with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 80.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Clemson
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
55.6
Efficiency
80.7
Usage
27
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 44. Middle Tennessee: 70. Georgia Tech: 109. Boston College: 36. TCU: 55. Maryland: 37. Wake Forest: 51. Miami: 37. Unknown: 45. Florida State: 53. NC State: 55. Virginia: 106. South Carolina: 49. Georgia Tech: 32
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 3 by 97.8. Middle Tennessee: 3 by 100. Georgia Tech: 5 by 100. Boston College: 6 by 40. TCU: 6 by 61.1. Maryland: 5 by 49.3. Wake Forest: 1 by 100. Miami: 2 by 100. Unknown: 4 by 75. Florida State: 5 by 70.7. NC State: 2 by 100. Virginia: 6 by 100. South Carolina: 5 by 65.3. Georgia Tech: 3 by 71.1
Split Comparison
Wins56.5 · n=8 · +0.1 vs Losses
Losses56.4 · n=5 · -0.1 vs Wins
First Half57.4 · n=7 · +3.6 vs Second Half
Second Half53.9 · n=7 · -3.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Georgia Tech
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/28 | vs Kentucky | W 21-13 | — | 3 | 44 | 11.5 | 14.70 | 1 | 32 |
| Sun 12/6 | vs Georgia Tech | L 34-39 | — | 3 | 32 | 9 | 10.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ South Carolina | L 17-34 | — | 5 | 49 | 6.9 | 9.80 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Virginia100 receiving yards | W 34-21 | — | 6 | 106 | 17.4 | 17.70 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ NC State | W 43-23 | — | 2 | 55 | 24 | 27.50 | 0 | 47 |
| Sun 11/8 | vs Florida State | W 40-24 | — | 5 | 53 | 10.2 | 10.60 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | 4 | 45 | 11 | 11.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Miami | W 40-37 | — | 2 | 37 | 13.3 | 18.50 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Wake Forest | W 38-3 | — | 1 | 51 | 27.5 | 51 | 0 | 51 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Maryland | L 21-24 | — | 5 | 37 | 8 | 7.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs TCU | L 10-14 | — | 6 | 55 | 9.2 | 9.20 | 0 | 23 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Boston College | W 25-7 | — | 6 | 36 | 6.6 | 6 | 0 | 29 |
| Thu 9/10 | @ Georgia Tech100 receiving yards | L 27-30 | — | 5 | 109 | 15.7 | 21.80 | 1 | 77 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 37-14 | — | 3 | 70 | 19.8 | 23.30 | 1 | 43 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200620072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Clemson | 120 | 36.7 | 12.1 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Clemson | 120 | 36.7 | 12.1 | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Clemson | 310 | 93.7 | 13.3 | 190 |
| 2008 Postseason | Clemson | 710 | 73.3 | 22.1 | 400 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Clemson | 710 | 73.3 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Clemson | 779 | 80.7 | 27 | 69 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Clemson | 779 | 80.7 | 27 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
109
Primary metric
109 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Nebraska
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Virginia
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
NC State
106
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
106 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UL Monroe
68
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
68 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Clemson
779 primary output · 80.7 efficiency · 27 usage
65.8
#2
2009 Regular Season · Clemson
65.8
779 primary · 80.7 efficiency · 27 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Clemson
59.9
710 primary · 73.3 efficiency · 22.1 usage
Milestones
4
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,919
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.