Usage Score
28.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Memphis
Duke Calhoun
WR • 6'4" • Memphis, TN, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Duke Calhoun reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
68.5
Consistency
55.6
Season Value
63.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Memphis
060707080809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Memphis
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Duke Calhoun, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Memphis. Duke Calhoun reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Memphis paired 890 primary output with 76.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 68.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
76.9
Efficiency
68.5
Usage
28.4
Consistency
55.6
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ole Miss: 53. Middle Tennessee: 27. Unknown: 174. Marshall: 141. UCF: 162. UTEP: 33. Southern Miss: 83. East Carolina: 91. Tennessee: 38. UAB: 79. Houston: 17. Tulsa: 25
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ole Miss: 5 by 70.7. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 45. Unknown: 9 by 100. Marshall: 5 by 100. UCF: 4 by 100. UTEP: 3 by 73.3. Southern Miss: 11 by 50.3. East Carolina: 9 by 67.4. Tennessee: 5 by 50.7. UAB: 4 by 100. Houston: 5 by 22.7. Tulsa: 4 by 41.7
Split Comparison
Losses71.6 · n=10
First Half98.3 · n=6 · +42.8 vs Second Half
Second Half55.5 · n=6 · -42.8 vs First Half
All Games76.9 · n=12
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs UAB
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Tulsa | L 30-33 | — | 4 | 25 | 6.3 | 6.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Houston | L 14-55 | — | 5 | 17 | 3.4 | 3.40 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs UAB | L 21-31 | — | 4 | 79 | 16 | 19.80 | 0 | 62 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Tennessee | L 28-56 | — | 5 | 38 | 7.6 | 7.60 | 0 | 13 |
| Wed 10/28 | vs East CarolinaHigh volume | L 19-38 | — | 9 | 91 | 8.5 | 10.10 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Southern MissHigh volume | L 16-36 | — | 11 | 83 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 12 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs UTEP | W 35-20 | — | 3 | 33 | 8.3 | 11 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ UCF100 receiving yards | L 14-32 | — | 4 | 162 | 32.8 | 40.50 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Marshall100 receiving yards | L 16-27 | — | 5 | 141 | 28.2 | 28.20 | 1 | 80 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 9 | 174 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 1 | 85 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Middle Tennessee | L 14-31 | — | 4 | 27 | 3 | 6.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Ole Miss | L 14-45 | — | 5 | 53 | 6 | 10.60 | 0 | 16 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Memphis
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072007200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Memphis | 681 | 84 | 18 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Memphis | 890 | 76.8 | 20 | 209 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Memphis | 890 | 76.8 | 20 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Memphis | 487 | 77.5 | 16.2 | -403 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Memphis | 487 | 77.5 | 16.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Memphis | 923 | 68.5 | 28.4 | 436 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
174
Primary metric
174 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTEP
129
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UAB
159
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
159 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
UCF
162
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Marshall
72
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Postseason · Memphis
890 primary output · 76.8 efficiency · 20 usage
64.7
#2
2007 Regular Season · Memphis
64.7
890 primary · 76.8 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Memphis
63.1
923 primary · 68.5 efficiency · 28.4 usage
Milestones
10
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,981
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 49 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.