Usage Score
30.6
Player Dossier
2007-2010Hawai'i
Greg Salas
WR • 6'2" • Chino, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Greg Salas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
89.7
Consistency
77.3
Season Value
74.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Hawai'i
070808091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Hawai'i
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Greg Salas, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · Hawai'i. Greg Salas reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
Hawai'i paired 1,889 primary output with 89.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 89.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · Hawai'i
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
134.9
Efficiency
89.7
Usage
30.6
Consistency
77.3
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 214. USC: 124. Army: 63. Colorado: 94. Unknown: 131. Louisiana Tech: 197. Fresno State: 148. Nevada: 153. Utah State: 158. Idaho: 168. Boise State: 10. San José State: 144. New Mexico State: 191. UNLV: 94
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 13 by 100. USC: 8 by 100. Army: 7 by 60. Colorado: 9 by 69.6. Unknown: 7 by 100. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 100. Fresno State: 9 by 100. Nevada: 11 by 92.7. Utah State: 9 by 100. Idaho: 11 by 100. Boise State: 2 by 33.3. San José State: 8 by 100. New Mexico State: 10 by 100. UNLV: 5 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins146.2 · n=9 · +35.7 vs Losses
Losses110.5 · n=4 · -35.7 vs Wins
First Half138.7 · n=7 · +7.6 vs Second Half
Second Half131.1 · n=7 · -7.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/25 | @ Tulsa100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-62 | — | 13 | 214 | 16.5 | 16.50 | 2 | 55 |
| Sun 12/5 | vs UNLV2+ TD | W 59-21 | — | 5 | 94 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 2 | 54 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ New Mexico State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 59-24 | — | 10 | 191 | 19.1 | 19.10 | 1 | 40 |
| Sun 11/21 | vs San José State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-7 | — | 8 | 144 | 18 | 18 | 1 | 47 |
| Sat 11/6 | @ Boise State | L 7-42 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 10/31 | vs Idaho100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-10 | — | 11 | 168 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 38 |
| Sat 10/23 | @ Utah State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 45-7 | — | 9 | 158 | 17.6 | 17.60 | 1 | 35 |
| Sun 10/17 | vs Nevada100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-21 | — | 11 | 153 | 13.9 | 13.90 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 10/10 | @ Fresno State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-27 | — | 9 | 148 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 3 | 30 |
| Sun 10/3 | vs Louisiana Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-21 | — | 10 | 197 | 19.7 | 19.70 | 2 | 32 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 131 | 18.7 | 18.70 | 2 | 40 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ ColoradoHigh volume | L 13-31 | — | 9 | 94 | 10.4 | 10.40 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Army | W 31-28 | — | 7 | 63 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 9/3 | vs USC100 receiving yards · High volume | L 36-49 | — | 8 | 124 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 0 | 47 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Hawai'i
2007-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200720082008200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 35 | 73.4 | 4.5 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Hawai'i | 831 | 87.9 | 19.9 | 796 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 831 | 87.9 | 19.9 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 1,590 | 84.6 | 31.2 | 759 |
| 2010 Postseason | Hawai'i | 1,889 | 89.7 | 30.6 | 299 |
| 2010 Regular Season | Hawai'i | 1,889 | 89.7 | 30.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulsa
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
214
Primary metric
214 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah State
187
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
187 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
New Mexico State
196
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
196 receiving yards with a 81.7 efficiency score.
#4
New Mexico State
191
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
191 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Washington State
131
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
131 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · Hawai'i
1,889 primary output · 89.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage
74.4
#2
2010 Regular Season · Hawai'i
74.4
1,889 primary · 89.7 efficiency · 30.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Hawai'i
69.9
1,590 primary · 84.6 efficiency · 31.2 usage
Milestones
19
100+ receiving yards
17
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
4,345
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.