Usage Score
12.3
Player Dossier
2006-2009Purdue
Jaycen Taylor
RB • 5'10" • Hawthorne, CA, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Jaycen Taylor leans balanced backfield option traits and 53.7 efficiency.
Efficiency
53.7
Consistency
27.8
Season Value
37.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Postseason · Purdue
060607070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaycen Taylor, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Postseason · Purdue. Jaycen Taylor leans balanced backfield option traits and 53.7 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Postseason
Purdue paired 938 primary output with 65.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 53.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Scrimmage Yards / G
42
Efficiency
53.7
Usage
12.3
Consistency
27.8
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 81. Oregon: 16. Northern Illinois: 9. Notre Dame: 44. Northwestern: 6. Minnesota: 4. Ohio State: 0. Illinois: 71. Wisconsin: 19. Michigan: 9. Michigan State: 76. Indiana: 169
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 14 by 60.3. Oregon: 7 by 23.8. Northern Illinois: 2 by 46.9. Notre Dame: 3 by 68.8. Northwestern: 1 by 62.5. Minnesota: 1 by 33.3. Illinois: 6 by 99.3. Wisconsin: 6 by 33. Michigan: 3 by 31.3. Michigan State: 11 by 70.5. Indiana: 27 by 60.5
Split Comparison
Wins66 · n=5 · +41.1 vs Losses
Losses24.9 · n=7 · -41.1 vs Wins
First Half26.7 · n=6 · -30.7 vs Second Half
Second Half57.3 · n=6 · +30.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
99.3 vs Illinois
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | @ Indiana100 rush yards · 150 scrimmage yards | W 38-21 | 20 | 110 | 5.50 | 0 | 7 | 59 | 6.3 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Michigan State | L 37-40 | 9 | 60 | 6.70 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 6.9 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Michigan | W 38-36 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-37 | 6 | 19 | 3.20 | 0 | — | — | 3.2 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Illinois | W 24-14 | 6 | 71 | 11.80 | 1 | — | — | 11.8 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Ohio State | W 26-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Minnesota | L 20-35 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Northwestern | L 21-27 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Notre Dame | L 21-24 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 38 | 14.7 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Northern Illinois | L 21-28 | 2 | 9 | 4.50 | 0 | — | — | 4.5 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Oregon | L 36-38 | 7 | 16 | 2.30 | 1 | — | — | 2.3 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Toledo2+ TD | W 52-31 | 14 | 81 | 5.80 | 2 | — | — | 5.8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620062007200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Purdue | 938 | 65.9 | 19.7 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Purdue | 938 | 65.9 | 19.7 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Purdue | 625 | 55.9 | 21.6 | -313 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Purdue | 625 | 55.9 | 21.6 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Purdue | 0 | — | — | -625 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 504 | 53.7 | 12.3 | 504 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
171
Primary metric
171 scrimmage yards and 33.9 usage.
#2
Indiana
169
Primary metric
Win driven by a workhorse rushing load.
169 scrimmage yards and 50.9 usage.
#3
Minnesota
110
Primary metric
Win with 110 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
110 scrimmage yards and 27.7 usage.
#4
Indiana
123
Primary metric
Win with 123 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
123 scrimmage yards and 36.4 usage.
#5
Michigan State
112
Primary metric
Win with 112 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
112 scrimmage yards and 22.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Postseason · Purdue
938 primary output · 65.9 efficiency · 19.7 usage
64.2
#2
2006 Regular Season · Purdue
64.2
938 primary · 65.9 efficiency · 19.7 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Purdue
50
625 primary · 55.9 efficiency · 21.6 usage
Milestones
5
100+ rush yards
2
150+ scrimmage yards
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,067
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.