Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2008Army
—
Wesley McMahand shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
5.6
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Wesley McMahand, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Army. Wesley McMahand shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Army paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
5.6
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 0. Unknown: 0. Akron: 0. Texas A&M: 0. Tulane: 0. Eastern Michigan: 1. Buffalo: 0. Louisiana Tech: 0. Air Force: 0. Rice: 1. Rutgers: 0. Navy: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
— vs Navy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/6 | vs Navy | L 0-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 38 | 9.50 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Rutgers | L 3-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rice | L 31-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 83 | 10.40 | 1 | 43 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Air Force | L 7-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -2 | -2 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 14-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 25 | 4.20 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Buffalo | L 24-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 29 | 4.10 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/11 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 17-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 46 | 15.30 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Tulane | W 44-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 38 | 9.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Texas A&M | L 17-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Akron | L 3-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 45 | 45 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Fri 8/29 | vs Temple | L 7-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Army | 4 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Army | 2 | — | — | -2 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Army | 2 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Texas A&M
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Boston College
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Akron
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Rice
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Army
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
53.4
#2
2006 Regular Season · Army
52.8
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Army
52.8
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Wesley McMahand quick answers