Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2008Syracuse
—
Curtis Brinkley shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
57.9
Season Value
79
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Syracuse
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Curtis Brinkley, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Syracuse. Curtis Brinkley shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Syracuse paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2008 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
57.9
Best Game by takeover score
Cincinnati
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 1. Akron: 1. Penn State: 0. Unknown: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. West Virginia: 0. South Florida: 1. Louisville: 1. Rutgers: 0. UConn: 1. Notre Dame: 1. Cincinnati: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
— vs Cincinnati
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | @ Cincinnati | L 10-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 60 | 3.80 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Notre Dame | W 24-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 44 | 2.60 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 11/16 | vs UConn | L 14-39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 94 | 4.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Rutgers | L 17-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 67 | 3.70 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Louisville | W 28-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33 | 166 | 5 | 1 | 45 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ South Florida | L 13-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 112 | 5.60 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ West Virginia | L 6-17 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 100.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 28 | 144 | 5.10 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Pittsburgh | L 24-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 119 | 7.40 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 145 | 6 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Penn State | L 13-55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 21 | 1.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Akron | L 28-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 143 | 6.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Northwestern | L 10-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 49 | 5.40 | 1 | 28 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Syracuse
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Syracuse | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Syracuse | 3 | — | — | 3 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Syracuse | 2 | — | — | -1 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Syracuse | 7 | — | — | 5 |
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Rutgers
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
West Virginia
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Notre Dame
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
UConn
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Syracuse
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2008 Regular Season · Syracuse
79
7 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Syracuse
54.2
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
10
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Curtis Brinkley quick answers