Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Player Dossier
2006-2009SMU
WR • 5'11" • Bellville, TX, USA
Emmanuel Sanders reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
100%
Featured offensive role
Impact Production
91
Top-tier box-score impact for a receiver
Reliability
74
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
89
Elite ceiling indicators
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · SMU
Snapshot
Player Story
Emmanuel Sanders built his college career from 2006 through 2009 as a wide receiver from Bellville, TX wearing No. 17, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Emmanuel Sanders' career was his receiving role: 285...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Emmanuel Sanders, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2009 Postseason · SMU. Emmanuel Sanders reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | SMU | 11 | 46 | 605 | 9 | 64.4 |
| 2007 Regular Season | SMU | 12 | 74 | 889 | 9 | 76.7 |
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 10 | 67 | 958 | 9 | 82.9 |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 13 | 7 | 124 | 1 | 87.7 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 13 | 91 | 1,215 | 7 | 87.7 |
Related Context
Emmanuel Sanders played WR for SMU. Across 4 tracked seasons, Emmanuel Sanders recorded 40 rushing yards, 3,791 receiving yards, and 35 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with SMU.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
SMU paired 1,339 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 77.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
74.1
Efficiency
77.1
Usage
28.5
Consistency
68.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulane
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 28. North Texas: 72. Arkansas State: 100. TCU: 98. UTEP: 95. Southern Miss: 47. Tulane: 155. Tulsa: 57. Houston: 76. Rice: 32. UCF: 11. Memphis: 118
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 3 by 62.2. North Texas: 10 by 48. Arkansas State: 8 by 83.3. TCU: 7 by 93.3. UTEP: 6 by 100. Southern Miss: 4 by 78.3. Tulane: 8 by 100. Tulsa: 6 by 63.3. Houston: 5 by 100. Rice: 2 by 100. UCF: 2 by 36.7. Memphis: 13 by 60.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Rice
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Memphis100 receiving yards · High volume | L 52-55 | — | 13 | 118 | 9 | 9.10 | 3 | 26 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs UCF | L 20-49 | — | 2 | 11 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Rice | L 42-43 | — | 2 | 32 | 12 | 16 | 1 | 16 |
| Mon 11/5 | @ Houston | L 28-38 | — | 5 | 76 | 13.7 | 15.20 | 0 | 44 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Tulsa | L 23-29 | — | 6 | 57 | 8.7 | 9.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 10/21 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-41 | — | 8 | 155 | 19.4 | 19.40 | 2 | 49 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Southern Miss | L 7-28 | — | 4 | 47 | 10 | 11.80 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UTEP | L 45-48 | — | 6 | 95 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 0 | 48 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ TCU | L 7-21 | — | 7 | 98 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Arkansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 28-45 | — | 8 | 100 | 11.4 | 12.50 | 1 | 54 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs North TexasHigh volume | W 45-31 | — | 10 | 72 | 7.2 | 7.20 | 1 | 13 |
| Mon 9/3 | vs Texas Tech | L 9-49 | — | 3 | 28 | 9.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 12 |
Player Story
Emmanuel Sanders built his college career from 2006 through 2009 as a wide receiver from Bellville, TX wearing No. 17, spending time with SMU. The clearest part of Emmanuel Sanders' career was his receiving role: 285 catches, 3,791 receiving yards, 34 touchdowns, and 40 rushing yards across 46 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2009 with SMU. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 40 rushing yards and 477 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 46 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across SMU.
The arc is straightforward: Emmanuel Sanders moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | SMU | 605 | 77.2 | 22.5 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | SMU | 889 | 77.1 | 28.5 | 284 |
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 958 | 83.9 | 29.7 | 69 |
| 2009 Postseason | SMU | 1,339 | 82.5 | 34.2 | 381 |
| 2009 Regular Season | SMU | 1,339 | 82.5 | 34.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Houston
Week 11 · L 27-37 · Conference game
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
151
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
151 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
vs Texas State
Week 2 · W 47-36
138
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
vs Tulsa
Week 7 · L 31-37 · Conference game
132
Receiving Yards
98.6 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
132 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
vs Tulane
Week 8 · L 34-41 · Conference game
155
Receiving Yards
98.4 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
@ Texas Tech
Week 3 · L 7-43
125
Receiving Yards
96.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2009 Postseason · SMU
1,339 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 34.2 usage
87.7
#2
2009 Regular Season · SMU
87.7
1,339 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 34.2 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · SMU
82.9
958 primary · 83.9 efficiency · 29.7 usage
16
100+ receiving yards
16
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.