Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2007SMU
—
James Mapps shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
5.6
Season Value
52.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
James Mapps, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · SMU. James Mapps shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
SMU paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2007 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
5.6
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 0. North Texas: 2. Arkansas State: 0. TCU: 0. UTEP: 2. Southern Miss: 0. Tulane: 0. Tulsa: 0. Houston: 0. Rice: 0. UCF: 0. Memphis: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
— vs Memphis
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Memphis | L 52-55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs UCF | L 20-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 56 | 9.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Rice | L 42-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 38 | 3.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Mon 11/5 | @ Houston | L 28-38 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 6 | 27 | 4.50 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Tulsa | L 23-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 69 | 4.90 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 10/21 | vs Tulane | L 34-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 34 | 3.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Southern Miss | L 7-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 51 | 6.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs UTEP | L 45-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 26 | 149 | 5.70 | 2 | 21 |
| Sun 9/23 | @ TCU | L 7-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Arkansas State | L 28-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/9 | vs North Texas | W 45-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 46 | 4.60 | 2 | 29 |
| Mon 9/3 | vs Texas Tech | L 9-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 26 | 4.30 | 0 | 8 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2006-2007
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | SMU | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | SMU | 4 | — | — | 2 |
#1 Featured game
UAB
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Arkansas State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
UTEP
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
North Texas
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Tulsa
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · SMU
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
53.1
#2
2007 Regular Season · SMU
52.8
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7444
Royse City · Royse City, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
James Mapps quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit