Usage Score
19.6
Player Dossier
2005-2010BYU
Luke Ashworth
WR • 6'2" • Provo, UT, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Luke Ashworth reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60.4
Consistency
32.7
Season Value
52.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · BYU
050506070809091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Luke Ashworth, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · BYU. Luke Ashworth reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
BYU paired 387 primary output with 79.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 60.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · BYU
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
36.8
Efficiency
60.4
Usage
19.6
Consistency
32.7
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UTEP: 9. Washington: 24. Air Force: 8. Florida State: 6. Nevada: 15. Wyoming: 57. UNLV: 83. Colorado State: 113. New Mexico: 41. Utah: 12
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UTEP: 1 by 60. Washington: 6 by 26.7. Air Force: 1 by 53.3. Florida State: 2 by 20. Nevada: 2 by 50. Wyoming: 6 by 63.3. UNLV: 5 by 100. Colorado State: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 3 by 91.1. Utah: 2 by 40
Split Comparison
Wins54.5 · n=6 · +44.3 vs Losses
Losses10.3 · n=4 · -44.3 vs Wins
First Half12.4 · n=5 · -48.8 vs Second Half
Second Half61.2 · n=5 · +48.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Colorado State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Colorado State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/18 | @ UTEP | W 52-24 | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/27 | @ Utah | L 16-17 | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/20 | vs New Mexico | W 40-7 | — | 3 | 41 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ Colorado State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 49-10 | — | 4 | 113 | 28.3 | 28.30 | 4 | 62 |
| Sat 11/6 | vs UNLV | W 55-7 | — | 5 | 83 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/23 | vs Wyoming | W 25-20 | — | 6 | 57 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 9/25 | vs Nevada | L 13-27 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Florida State | L 10-34 | — | 2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/11 | @ Air Force | L 14-35 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/4 | vs Washington | W 23-17 | — | 6 | 24 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2005-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
200520052006200720082009200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Postseason | BYU | 90 | 65.6 | 4.3 | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | BYU | 90 | 65.6 | 4.3 | 0 |
| 2006 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | -90 |
| 2007 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | BYU | 49 | 73.3 | 4.2 | 49 |
| 2009 Postseason | BYU | 387 | 79.3 | 11.9 | 338 |
| 2009 Regular Season | BYU | 387 | 79.3 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2010 Postseason | BYU | 368 | 60.4 | 19.6 | -19 |
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 368 | 60.4 | 19.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
91
Primary metric
91 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Colorado State
113
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
113 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Utah State
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
TCU
34
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UNLV
83
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
83 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · BYU
387 primary output · 79.3 efficiency · 11.9 usage
60.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · BYU
60.2
387 primary · 79.3 efficiency · 11.9 usage
#3
2010 Postseason · BYU
52.9
368 primary · 60.4 efficiency · 19.6 usage
Milestones
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
894
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 30 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.