Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2007Tulane
—
Anthony Scelfo shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
13.9
Season Value
57
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Tulane
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Anthony Scelfo, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Tulane. Anthony Scelfo shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Tulane paired 7 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2007 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
13.9
Best Game by takeover score
East Carolina
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Mississippi State: 0. Houston: 0. Unknown: 0. LSU: 0. Army: 0. UAB: 2. SMU: 1. Memphis: 1. Tulsa: 2. UTEP: 1. Rice: 0. East Carolina: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
— vs East Carolina
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ East Carolina | L 12-35 | 12 | 20 | 133 | 60.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Rice | W 45-31 | 5 | 12 | 63 | 41.7 | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 55 | 27.50 | 0 | 38 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs UTEP | W 34-19 | 7 | 11 | 167 | 63.6 | 1 | 0 | — | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Tulsa | L 25-49 | 17 | 28 | 237 | 60.7 | 1 | 1 | — | 10 | 14 | 1.40 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Memphis | L 27-28 | 7 | 15 | 84 | 46.7 | 1 | 1 | — | 7 | 36 | 5.10 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 10/21 | @ SMU | W 41-34 | 8 | 15 | 102 | 53.3 | 1 | 0 | — | 4 | 15 | 3.80 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ UAB | L 21-26 | 19 | 37 | 264 | 51.4 | 2 | 2 | — | 11 | 15 | 1.40 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Army | L 17-20 | 16 | 25 | 154 | 64.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs LSU | L 9-34 | 11 | 26 | 117 | 42.3 | 0 | 1 | — | 7 | 4 | 0.60 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/23 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 5 | 27 | 60.0 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Houston | L 10-34 | 5 | 9 | 46 | 55.6 | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | -7 | -2.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Mississippi State | L 17-38 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulane
2006-2007
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulane | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulane | 7 | — | — | 6 |
#1 Featured game
LSU
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Tulsa
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
UAB
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
UTEP
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Memphis
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Tulane
7 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
57
#2
2006 Regular Season · Tulane
54.2
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Anthony Scelfo quick answers