Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2005-2008Rutgers
Tiquan Underwood
—
Impact contributor
Tiquan Underwood shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
lowelite
Reliability
100
Regular contributor with several takeover games
lowhigh
Star Power
89
Elite ceiling indicators
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Rutgers
05060708
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 4
- Program Path
- Rutgers
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Navy
NFL Draft
- Draft Year
- 2009
- Selection
- Round 7 · Pick 44
- Overall
- No. 253
- NFL Team
- Jacksonville Jaguars
Tiquan Underwood, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · Rutgers. Tiquan Underwood shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Quick Answers
Tiquan Underwood quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Rutgers · Position unavailable
- Career Touchdowns
- 0
- Tracked sample
- 4 unique seasons · 4 entries · 41 games
- Best season
- 2005 Regular Season · Rutgers
- Top game
- Navy
- NFL Draft
- 2009 · Round 7 · Pick 44 · Jacksonville Jaguars
- Latest roster
- Class 2008
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Rutgers | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Rutgers | 9 | 0 | 4 | 34.1 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Rutgers | 12 | 0 | 7 | 57 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Rutgers | 12 | 0 | 5 | 39.9 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Tiquan Underwood
Tiquan Underwood is listed for Rutgers. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Rutgers paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2008 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · Rutgers
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
0
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
100
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 0. Villanova: 0. Pittsburgh: 0. West Virginia: 0. Syracuse: 0. UConn: 0. Navy: 0. Cincinnati: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 6 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 2 · +0 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
— vs Arizona State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/28 | vs Arizona State | L 40-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Cincinnati | W 44-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Navy | W 31-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | -2 | -1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ UConn | W 26-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Syracuse | W 31-9 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs West Virginia | L 14-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 37 | 4.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Pittsburgh | W 37-29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 28 | 3.50 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Villanova | W 38-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Rutgers
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
2005200620072008
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Rutgers | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Rutgers | 4 | — | — | 4 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Rutgers | 7 | — | — | 3 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Rutgers | 5 | — | — | -2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
@ Navy
Week 7 · W 34-0
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
vs South Florida
Week 8 · W 30-27 · Conference game
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
vs Buffalo
Week 1 · W 38-3
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
vs Louisville
Week 15 · W 63-14 · Conference game
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
vs Syracuse
Week 11 · W 35-17 · Conference game
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · Rutgers
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2007 Regular Season · Rutgers
57
7 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Rutgers
39.9
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Tiquan Underwood
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.