Usage Score
29.5
Player Dossier
2006-2009LSU
WR • 6'3" • Houston, TX, USA
Brandon LaFell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
29.5
Efficiency
83.6
Consistency
75.9
Season Value
68.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · LSU
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon LaFell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · LSU. Brandon LaFell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
LSU paired 929 primary output with 89.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 83.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
60.9
Efficiency
83.6
Usage
29.5
Consistency
75.9
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 87. Washington: 34. Vanderbilt: 38. Louisiana: 57. Mississippi State: 101. Georgia: 52. Florida: 44. Auburn: 67. Tulane: 85. Alabama: 28. Louisiana Tech: 54. Ole Miss: 75. Arkansas: 70
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 5 by 100. Washington: 4 by 56.7. Vanderbilt: 7 by 36.2. Louisiana: 3 by 100. Mississippi State: 6 by 100. Georgia: 3 by 100. Florida: 4 by 73.3. Auburn: 6 by 74.4. Tulane: 4 by 100. Alabama: 4 by 46.7. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 100. Ole Miss: 5 by 100. Arkansas: 4 by 100
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Mississippi State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Penn State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Penn State | L 17-19 | — | 5 | 87 | 15.7 | 17.40 | 1 | 36 |
| Sun 11/29 | vs Arkansas | W 33-30 | — | 4 | 70 | 17.5 | 17.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/21 | @ Ole Miss | L 23-25 | — | 5 | 75 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 26 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 24-16 | — | 2 | 54 | 27 | 27 | 1 | 38 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Alabama | L 15-24 | — | 4 | 28 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs Tulane2+ TD | W 42-0 | — | 4 | 85 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 2 | 39 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Auburn | W 31-10 | — | 6 | 67 | 8.6 | 11.20 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 10/11 | vs Florida | L 3-13 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Georgia | W 20-13 | — | 3 | 52 | 17.3 | 17.30 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Mississippi State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 30-26 | — | 6 | 101 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 2 | 58 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Louisiana2+ TD | W 31-3 | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 21 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Vanderbilt | W 23-9 | — | 7 | 38 | 5.1 | 5.40 | 0 | 20 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Washington | W 31-23 | — | 4 | 34 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 1 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
LSU
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | LSU | 140 | 72 | 5.6 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | LSU | 140 | 72 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | LSU | 656 | 75.5 | 20.3 | 516 |
| 2007 Regular Season | LSU | 656 | 75.5 | 20.3 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | LSU | 929 | 89.7 | 30 | 273 |
| 2008 Regular Season | LSU | 929 | 89.7 | 30 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | LSU | 792 | 83.6 | 29.5 | -137 |
| 2009 Regular Season | LSU | 792 | 83.6 | 29.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
101
Primary metric
101 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
125
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
125 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Troy
126
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
126 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#4
Penn State
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tulane
85
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
85 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · LSU
929 primary output · 89.7 efficiency · 30 usage
74.1
#2
2008 Regular Season · LSU
74.1
929 primary · 89.7 efficiency · 30 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · LSU
68.8
792 primary · 83.6 efficiency · 29.5 usage
4
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,517
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brandon LaFell quick answers