Usage Score
28.9
Player Dossier
2007-2009Michigan State
Blair White
WR • 6'2" • Saginaw, MI, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Blair White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77
Consistency
58.9
Season Value
66.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Michigan State
0708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Michigan State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Blair White, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Michigan State. Blair White reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Michigan State paired 990 primary output with 77 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Michigan State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
76.2
Efficiency
77
Usage
28.9
Consistency
58.9
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Texas Tech: 114. Unknown: 162. Central Michigan: 105. Notre Dame: 75. Wisconsin: 8. Michigan: 49. Illinois: 50. Northwestern: 186. Iowa: 95. Minnesota: 36. Western Michigan: 70. Purdue: 18. Penn State: 22
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Texas Tech: 6 by 100. Unknown: 9 by 100. Central Michigan: 7 by 100. Notre Dame: 6 by 83.3. Wisconsin: 1 by 53.3. Michigan: 6 by 54.4. Illinois: 4 by 83.3. Northwestern: 12 by 100. Iowa: 3 by 100. Minnesota: 4 by 60. Western Michigan: 6 by 77.8. Purdue: 3 by 40. Penn State: 3 by 48.9
Split Comparison
Wins74.6 · n=5 · +9.6 vs Losses
Losses65 · n=7 · -9.6 vs Wins
First Half80.4 · n=7 · +9.3 vs Second Half
Second Half71.2 · n=6 · -9.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
100 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/3 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards | L 31-41 | — | 6 | 114 | 19 | 19 | 1 | 49 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Penn State | L 14-42 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Purdue | W 40-37 | — | 3 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Western Michigan | W 49-14 | — | 6 | 70 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 11/1 | @ Minnesota | L 34-42 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Iowa | L 13-15 | — | 3 | 95 | 31.7 | 31.70 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Northwestern100 receiving yards · High volume | W 24-14 | — | 12 | 186 | 15.5 | 15.50 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Illinois | W 24-14 | — | 4 | 50 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Michigan | W 26-20 | — | 6 | 49 | 8.2 | 8.20 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Wisconsin | L 30-38 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Notre Dame2+ TD | L 30-33 | — | 6 | 75 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 2 | 30 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards | L 27-29 | — | 7 | 105 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · High volume | — | — | 9 | 162 | 18 | 18 | 2 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Michigan State
2007-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 Regular Season | Michigan State | 25 | 55.6 | 13.6 | — |
| 2008 Postseason | Michigan State | 659 | 76.8 | 20 | 634 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Michigan State | 659 | 76.8 | 20 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Michigan State | 990 | 77 | 28.9 | 331 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Michigan State | 990 | 77 | 28.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Northwestern
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
186
Primary metric
186 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wisconsin
164
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
164 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
162
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
143
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
143 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
105
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Michigan State
990 primary output · 77 efficiency · 28.9 usage
66.2
#2
2009 Regular Season · Michigan State
66.2
990 primary · 77 efficiency · 28.9 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Michigan State
52.8
659 primary · 76.8 efficiency · 20 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
1,674
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.