Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2006Michigan State
—
Kerry Reed shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
55.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Michigan State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kerry Reed, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Michigan State. Kerry Reed shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Michigan State paired 4 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
0.4
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Penn State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Idaho: 1. Eastern Michigan: 0. Pittsburgh: 1. Notre Dame: 2. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 0. Ohio State: 0. Northwestern: 0. Indiana: 0. Purdue: 0. Minnesota: 0. Penn State: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
— vs Penn State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ Penn State | L 13-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Minnesota | L 18-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Purdue | L 15-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Indiana | L 21-46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Northwestern | W 41-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Ohio State | L 7-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Michigan | L 13-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Illinois | L 20-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs Notre Dame | L 37-40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Pittsburgh | W 38-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 52-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Idaho | W 27-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Michigan State
2005-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Michigan State | 4 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Michigan State | 5 | — | — | 1 |
#1 Featured game
Penn State
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Northwestern
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Illinois
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Notre Dame
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Michigan State
4 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
56.7
#2
2006 Regular Season · Michigan State
55.6
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kerry Reed quick answers