Usage Score
10.9
Player Dossier
2006-2009Stanford
Jim Dray
TE • 6'5" • Paramus, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Jim Dray reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76.7
Consistency
55.3
Season Value
56.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Stanford
0607080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCLA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jim Dray, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Stanford. Jim Dray reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Stanford paired 178 primary output with 64.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 76.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Stanford
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
21.3
Efficiency
76.7
Usage
10.9
Consistency
55.3
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma: 17. Wake Forest: 9. Oregon State: 7. Arizona: 42. Arizona State: 16. Oregon: 35. Notre Dame: 23
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma: 1 by 100. Wake Forest: 1 by 60. Oregon State: 1 by 46.7. Arizona: 2 by 100. Arizona State: 2 by 53.3. Oregon: 2 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 76.7
Split Comparison
Wins24.7 · n=3 · +5.9 vs Losses
Losses18.8 · n=4 · -5.9 vs Wins
First Half18.8 · n=4 · -5.9 vs Second Half
Second Half24.7 · n=3 · +5.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona
Best efficiency game
100 vs Oklahoma
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062007200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Stanford | 178 | 64.3 | 14 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Stanford | 116 | 73.3 | 9.8 | -62 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Stanford | 12 | 40 | 5.9 | -104 |
| 2009 Postseason | Stanford | 149 | 76.7 | 10.9 | 137 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Stanford | 149 | 76.7 | 10.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCLA
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arizona
42
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
42 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Oregon
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Arizona
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 76.7 efficiency score.
#5
California
24
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Stanford
178 primary output · 64.3 efficiency · 14 usage
63.9
#2
2009 Postseason · Stanford
56.4
149 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 10.9 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Stanford
56.4
149 primary · 76.7 efficiency · 10.9 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.82
Lubbock-Cooper · Lubbock, TX
- Committed To
- North Texas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
455
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.