Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2008Temple
—
Bruce Francis shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
50.2
Season Value
75.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Temple
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bruce Francis, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Temple. Bruce Francis shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Temple paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
1.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
50.2
Best Game by takeover score
Akron
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Army: 1. UConn: 0. Buffalo: 2. Penn State: 0. Western Michigan: 0. Miami (OH): 2. Central Michigan: 1. Ohio: 0. Navy: 2. Kent State: 1. Eastern Michigan: 4. Akron: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Akron
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | vs Akron | W 27-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 55-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 11/13 | @ Kent State | L 38-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/1 | @ Navy | L 27-33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wed 10/22 | vs Ohio | W 14-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Central Michigan | L 14-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Miami (OH) | W 28-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Western Michigan | L 3-7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Penn State | L 3-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Buffalo | L 28-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs UConn | L 9-12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 8/29 | @ Army | W 35-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 4 | — | — | 4 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Temple | 5 | — | — | 1 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Temple | 13 | — | — | 8 |
#1 Featured game
Central Michigan
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Ohio
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Akron
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Army
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Bowling Green
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Temple
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2007 Regular Season · Temple
77.7
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Temple
75.1
13 primary · — efficiency · — usage
7
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Bruce Francis quick answers