Usage Score
12.6
Player Dossier
2005-2009UCLA
TE • 6'5" • West Hills, CA, USA
Logan Paulsen reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
12.6
Efficiency
63.5
Consistency
53
Season Value
57.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · UCLA
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Logan Paulsen, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · UCLA. Logan Paulsen reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
UCLA paired 362 primary output with 63.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 63.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
27.8
Efficiency
63.5
Usage
12.6
Consistency
53
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 31. San Diego State: 5. Tennessee: 22. Kansas State: 23. Stanford: 14. Oregon: 26. California: 96. Arizona: 23. Oregon State: 29. Washington: 56. Washington State: 27. Arizona State: 9. USC: 1
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 3 by 68.9. San Diego State: 1 by 33.3. Tennessee: 2 by 73.3. Kansas State: 2 by 76.7. Stanford: 2 by 46.7. Oregon: 1 by 100. California: 5 by 100. Arizona: 3 by 51.1. Oregon State: 4 by 48.3. Washington: 1 by 100. Washington State: 2 by 90. Arizona State: 2 by 30. USC: 1 by 6.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/29 | @ Temple | W 30-21 | — | 3 | 31 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sun 11/29 | @ USC | L 7-28 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Arizona State | W 23-13 | — | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 4.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Washington State | W 43-7 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs Washington | W 24-23 | — | 1 | 56 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 56 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Oregon State | L 19-26 | — | 4 | 29 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Arizona | L 13-27 | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs California | L 26-45 | — | 5 | 96 | 19.2 | 19.20 | 0 | 48 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Oregon | L 10-24 | — | 1 | 26 | 26 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Stanford | L 16-24 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/20 | vs Kansas State | W 23-9 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Tennessee | W 19-15 | — | 2 | 22 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs San Diego State | W 33-14 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UCLA
2005-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | UCLA | 33 | 63.4 | 4.7 | — |
| 2006 Postseason | UCLA | 331 | 72.3 | 13.9 | 298 |
| 2006 Regular Season | UCLA | 331 | 72.3 | 13.9 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | UCLA | 144 | 72.4 | 11.1 | -187 |
| 2007 Regular Season | UCLA | 144 | 72.4 | 11.1 | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UCLA | 18 | 100 | 4 | -126 |
| 2009 Postseason | UCLA | 362 | 63.5 | 12.6 | 344 |
| 2009 Regular Season | UCLA | 362 | 63.5 | 12.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
California
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
96
Primary metric
96 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Utah
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
BYU
43
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
43 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Tennessee
18
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
18 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · UCLA
362 primary output · 63.5 efficiency · 12.6 usage
57.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · UCLA
57.3
362 primary · 63.5 efficiency · 12.6 usage
#3
2006 Postseason · UCLA
55.5
331 primary · 72.3 efficiency · 13.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2020 · Rating 0.8185
St. Mary's · Stockton, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
888
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Logan Paulsen quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit