Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2008Penn State
—
Jordan Norwood shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
44.4
Season Value
72.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Norwood, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Penn State. Jordan Norwood shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Penn State paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2008 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
44.4
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 1. Unknown: 1. Oregon State: 1. Syracuse: 2. Temple: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Michigan: 1. Ohio State: 0. Indiana: 0. Michigan State: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
— vs USC
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/1 | @ USC | L 24-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/22 | vs Michigan State | W 49-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/15 | vs Indiana | W 34-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/26 | @ Ohio State | W 13-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/18 | vs Michigan | W 46-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/12 | @ Wisconsin | W 48-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Temple | W 45-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Syracuse | W 55-13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Oregon State | W 45-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 8/30 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -11 | -11 | 0 | 0 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Penn State | 2 | — | — | 2 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Penn State | 5 | — | — | 3 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Penn State | 6 | — | — | 1 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan State
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Akron
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Temple
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Syracuse
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Penn State
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2008 Regular Season · Penn State
72.2
6 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Penn State
56.1
5 primary · — efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 43 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Norwood quick answers