Usage Score
23.7
Player Dossier
2006-2009Purdue
Joey Elliott
QB • 6'2" • Evansville, IN, USA
Balanced quarterback profileVolume operator
Joey Elliott is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Efficiency
58.9
Consistency
81.5
Season Value
65.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Purdue
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Joey Elliott, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season · Purdue. Joey Elliott is a balanced quarterback profile with 23.7 usage in the latest tracked season.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Purdue paired 3,294 primary output with 58.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 58.9 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
274.5
Efficiency
58.9
Usage
23.7
Consistency
81.5
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Toledo: 215. Oregon: 283. Northern Illinois: 256. Notre Dame: 283. Northwestern: 317. Minnesota: 348. Ohio State: 312. Illinois: 228. Wisconsin: 76. Michigan: 387. Michigan State: 386. Indiana: 203
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Toledo: 31 by 45.8. Oregon: 48 by 54.3. Northern Illinois: 37 by 78.8. Notre Dame: 43 by 52.7. Northwestern: 36 by 63.8. Minnesota: 57 by 59.5. Ohio State: 58 by 59.9. Illinois: 33 by 72.3. Wisconsin: 30 by 37.5. Michigan: 49 by 62.4. Michigan State: 62 by 61.5. Indiana: 36 by 57.8
Split Comparison
Wins269 · n=5 · -9.4 vs Losses
Losses278.4 · n=7 · +9.4 vs Wins
First Half283.7 · n=6 · +18.3 vs Second Half
Second Half265.3 · n=6 · -18.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
78.8 vs Northern Illinois
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | @ Indiana3+ TD | W 38-21 | 21 | 29 | 205 | 72.4 | 4 | 0 | 57.8 | 7 | -2 | -0.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Michigan State300-yard game | L 37-40 | 39 | 55 | 373 | 70.9 | 2 | 0 | 61.5 | 7 | 13 | 1.90 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Michigan300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 38-36 | 28 | 39 | 367 | 71.8 | 2 | 2 | 62.4 | 10 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Wisconsin | L 0-37 | 5 | 23 | 59 | 21.7 | 0 | 1 | 37.5 | 7 | 17 | 2.40 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs IllinoisDual-threat | W 24-14 | 15 | 24 | 166 | 62.5 | 0 | 0 | 72.3 | 9 | 62 | 6.90 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Ohio State | W 26-18 | 31 | 50 | 281 | 62.0 | 2 | 1 | 59.9 | 8 | 31 | 3.90 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Minnesota | L 20-35 | 25 | 47 | 299 | 53.2 | 2 | 2 | 59.5 | 10 | 49 | 4.90 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Northwestern300-yard game · 3+ TD | L 21-27 | 20 | 28 | 313 | 71.4 | 3 | 1 | 63.8 | 8 | 4 | 0.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/27 | vs Notre Dame3+ TD | L 21-24 | 22 | 38 | 289 | 57.9 | 3 | 1 | 52.7 | 5 | -6 | -1.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Northern IllinoisDual-threat | L 21-28 | 20 | 31 | 188 | 64.5 | 0 | 0 | 78.8 | 6 | 68 | 11.30 | 2 | 58 |
| Sun 9/13 | @ Oregon | L 36-38 | 24 | 41 | 266 | 58.5 | 1 | 2 | 54.3 | 7 | 17 | 2.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Toledo3+ TD | W 52-31 | 17 | 28 | 220 | 60.7 | 3 | 3 | 45.8 | 3 | -5 | -1.70 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Purdue | 81 | 52.5 | 4.2 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Purdue | 152 | 36.7 | 3.3 | 71 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Purdue | 94 | 44.4 | 8.3 | -58 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Purdue | 3,294 | 58.9 | 23.7 | 3,200 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Win shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
387
Primary metric
387 total offense with 62.4 efficiency.
#2
Minnesota
348
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
348 total offense with 59.5 efficiency.
#3
Michigan State
386
Primary metric
Loss with 386 yards of offense and 61.5 efficiency.
386 total offense with 61.5 efficiency.
#4
Penn State
57
Primary metric
Loss with 57 yards of offense and 68.3 efficiency.
57 total offense with 68.3 efficiency.
#5
Northwestern
317
Primary metric
Loss with 317 yards of offense and 63.8 efficiency.
317 total offense with 63.8 efficiency.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Regular Season · Purdue
3,294 primary output · 58.9 efficiency · 23.7 usage
65.8
#2
2008 Regular Season · Purdue
30.1
94 primary · 44.4 efficiency · 8.3 usage
#3
2006 Regular Season · Purdue
25.6
81 primary · 52.5 efficiency · 4.2 usage
Milestones
8
250+ passing yards
5
300+ total offense
0
3+ takeover TD games
8
Above avg efficiency
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,621
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 22 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.