Usage Score
23.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Oregon
Ed Dickson
TE • 6'5" • Bellflower, CA, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ed Dickson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.4
Consistency
39.8
Season Value
60.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oregon
06060707080809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Oregon
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Boise State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ed Dickson, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Oregon. Ed Dickson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Oregon paired 508 primary output with 83.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: California
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Oregon
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
50.1
Efficiency
78.4
Usage
23.4
Consistency
39.8
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Boise State: 19. Purdue: 32. Utah: 7. California: 148. Washington State: 103. UCLA: 24. Washington: 29. USC: 35. Stanford: 67. Arizona State: 24. Arizona: 63
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Boise State: 2 by 63.3. Purdue: 1 by 100. Utah: 1 by 46.7. California: 11 by 89.7. Washington State: 7 by 98.1. UCLA: 3 by 53.3. Washington: 2 by 96.7. USC: 3 by 77.8. Stanford: 4 by 100. Arizona State: 3 by 53.3. Arizona: 5 by 84
Split Comparison
Wins51.7 · n=9 · +8.7 vs Losses
Losses43 · n=2 · -8.7 vs Wins
First Half55.5 · n=6 · +11.9 vs Second Half
Second Half43.6 · n=5 · -11.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
California
Best efficiency game
100 vs Stanford
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/22 | @ Arizona | W 44-41 | — | 5 | 63 | 12.6 | 12.60 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 11/15 | vs Arizona State | W 44-21 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Stanford | L 42-51 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/1 | vs USC | W 47-20 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Washington | W 43-19 | — | 2 | 29 | 14.5 | 14.50 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ UCLA | W 24-10 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 10/4 | vs Washington State100 receiving yards | W 52-6 | — | 7 | 103 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 29 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs California100 receiving yards · High volume | W 42-3 | — | 11 | 148 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 3 | 36 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Utah | W 31-24 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sun 9/13 | vs Purdue | W 38-36 | — | 1 | 32 | 32 | 32 | 0 | 32 |
| Fri 9/4 | @ Boise State | L 8-19 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oregon
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200620072007200820082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Oregon | 45 | 75 | 11.9 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Oregon | 45 | 75 | 11.9 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Oregon | 453 | 65.2 | 18.6 | 408 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Oregon | 453 | 65.2 | 18.6 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Oregon | 508 | 83.2 | 23.6 | 55 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Oregon | 508 | 83.2 | 23.6 | 0 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Oregon | 551 | 78.4 | 23.4 | 43 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Boise State
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103
Primary metric
103 receiving yards with a 98.1 efficiency score.
#2
California
148
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
148 receiving yards with a 89.7 efficiency score.
#3
USC
69
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
69 receiving yards with a 92 efficiency score.
#4
Purdue
93
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
93 receiving yards with a 88.6 efficiency score.
#5
Washington State
70
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
70 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Oregon
508 primary output · 83.2 efficiency · 23.6 usage
67.1
#2
2008 Regular Season · Oregon
67.1
508 primary · 83.2 efficiency · 23.6 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · Oregon
60.1
551 primary · 78.4 efficiency · 23.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2020 · Rating 0.817
Lawndale · Lawndale, CA
- Committed To
- Kansas
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2020
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,557
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.