Usage Score
37.6
Player Dossier
2006-2009Central Michigan
QB • 6'3" • Downers Grove, IL, USA
Dan LeFevour is a dual-threat creator with 37.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Usage Score
37.6
Efficiency
66
Consistency
82.3
Season Value
69.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Central Michigan
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dan LeFevour, QB. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Central Michigan. Dan LeFevour is a dual-threat creator with 37.6 usage in the latest tracked season.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 4,774 primary output with 68.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Primary Metric / G
296.5
Efficiency
66
Usage
37.6
Consistency
82.3
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 407. Arizona: 126. Michigan State: 338. Unknown: 101. Akron: 337. Buffalo: 366. Eastern Michigan: 362. Western Michigan: 313. Bowling Green: 275. Boston College: 178. Toledo: 360. Ball State: 403. Northern Illinois: 279. Ohio: 306
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 64 by 56.5. Arizona: 40 by 48.5. Michigan State: 59 by 57.5. Unknown: 15 by 69.3. Akron: 50 by 72. Buffalo: 49 by 72.7. Eastern Michigan: 33 by 78.2. Western Michigan: 45 by 68.9. Bowling Green: 44 by 71.6. Boston College: 45 by 52. Toledo: 50 by 68.3. Ball State: 42 by 82.9. Northern Illinois: 47 by 64.4. Ohio: 56 by 61.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Total Offense
Top game by takeover score
Buffalo
Best efficiency game
82.9 vs Ball State
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/7 | @ Troy300-yard game | W 44-41 | 33 | 55 | 395 | 60.0 | 1 | 1 | 56.5 | 9 | 12 | 1.30 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs OhioDual-threat | W 20-10 | 28 | 39 | 255 | 71.8 | 2 | 1 | 61.5 | 17 | 51 | 3 | 0 | 20 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Northern Illinois3+ TD | W 45-31 | 27 | 41 | 255 | 65.9 | 3 | 0 | 64.4 | 6 | 24 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
| Thu 11/19 | @ Ball State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 35-3 | 25 | 28 | 344 | 89.3 | 4 | 0 | 82.9 | 14 | 59 | 4.20 | 1 | 15 |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Toledo300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 56-28 | 29 | 36 | 341 | 80.6 | 2 | 0 | 68.3 | 14 | 19 | 1.40 | 4 | 8 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Boston College | L 10-31 | 20 | 34 | 152 | 58.8 | 0 | 1 | 52 | 11 | 26 | 2.40 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Bowling GreenDual-threat | W 24-10 | 16 | 22 | 147 | 72.7 | 2 | 0 | 71.6 | 22 | 128 | 5.80 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Western Michigan3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 34-23 | 18 | 31 | 238 | 58.1 | 2 | 0 | 68.9 | 14 | 75 | 5.40 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Eastern Michigan300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 56-8 | 16 | 22 | 318 | 72.7 | 3 | 0 | 78.2 | 11 | 44 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ BuffaloDual-threat | W 20-13 | 22 | 28 | 268 | 78.6 | 2 | 1 | 72.7 | 21 | 98 | 4.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Akron3+ TD · Dual-threat | W 48-21 | 23 | 31 | 197 | 74.2 | 4 | 1 | 72 | 19 | 140 | 7.40 | 2 | 53 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | 10 | 12 | 92 | 83.3 | 0 | 0 | 69.3 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Michigan State300-yard game · 3+ TD | W 29-27 | 33 | 46 | 328 | 71.7 | 3 | 1 | 57.5 | 13 | 10 | 0.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Arizona | L 6-19 | 18 | 31 | 108 | 58.1 | 0 | 1 | 48.5 | 9 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Central Michigan
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Central Michigan | 3,552 | 63.2 | 32.1 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 3,552 | 63.2 | 32.1 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Central Michigan | 4,774 | 68.2 | 36.8 | 1,222 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 4,774 | 68.2 | 36.8 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Central Michigan | 3,376 | 65.1 | 41 | -1,398 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 3,376 | 65.1 | 41 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Central Michigan | 4,151 | 66 | 37.6 | 775 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 4,151 | 66 | 37.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Buffalo
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
366
Primary metric
366 total offense with 72.7 efficiency.
#2
Ball State
420
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
420 total offense with 63.9 efficiency.
#3
Ball State
506
Primary metric
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
506 total offense with 84.7 efficiency.
#4
Purdue
406
Primary metric
Loss with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value.
406 total offense with 64 efficiency.
#5
Purdue
403
Primary metric
Loss shaped by high passing volume and turnover pressure.
403 total offense with 60.1 efficiency.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Postseason · Central Michigan
4,774 primary output · 68.2 efficiency · 36.8 usage
71.5
#2
2007 Regular Season · Central Michigan
71.5
4,774 primary · 68.2 efficiency · 36.8 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
69.8
4,151 primary · 66 efficiency · 37.6 usage
38
250+ passing yards
29
300+ total offense
8
3+ takeover TD games
41
Above avg efficiency
Recruit Profile
Class 2003 · Rating 0.7667
Lincoln · Tallahassee, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
15,853
Career Total Offense
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 53 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Dan LeFevour quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit