Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2006Tulsa
—
Ryan Bugg shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
55.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Bugg, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Tulsa. Ryan Bugg shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2006 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Utah
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 0. Unknown: 0. BYU: 0. North Texas: 1. Navy: 1. Southern Miss: 0. East Carolina: 1. Memphis: 1. UTEP: 0. Houston: 0. Rice: 0. SMU: 0. Tulane: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
— vs Utah
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/24 | @ Utah | L 13-25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Tulane | W 38-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ SMU | L 24-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Rice | L 38-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Houston | L 10-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs UTEP | W 30-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/22 | @ Memphis | W 35-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ East Carolina | W 31-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Tue 10/3 | vs Southern Miss | W 20-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Navy | W 24-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs North Texas | W 28-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ BYU | L 24-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2005-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Tulsa | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulsa | 4 | — | — | 2 |
#1 Featured game
Houston
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Minnesota
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Memphis
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
East Carolina
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Navy
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Tulsa
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
75
#2
2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
55.2
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2003 · Rating 0.8
Plant City · Plant City, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Ryan Bugg quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit