Usage Score
27.3
Player Dossier
2005-2010San Diego State
DeMarco Sampson
WR • 6'2" • Chula Vista, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
DeMarco Sampson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
92.4
Consistency
61.5
Season Value
70.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · San Diego State
05060708091010
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- San Diego State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Colorado State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
DeMarco Sampson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason · San Diego State. DeMarco Sampson reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2010 Postseason
San Diego State paired 1,220 primary output with 92.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2010 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2010 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Wyoming
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2010 Postseason · San Diego State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
93.8
Efficiency
92.4
Usage
27.3
Consistency
61.5
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Navy: 45. Unknown: 179. New Mexico State: 73. Missouri: 81. Utah State: 40. BYU: 47. Air Force: 106. New Mexico: 127. Wyoming: 175. Colorado State: 23. TCU: 42. Utah: 154. UNLV: 128
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Navy: 2 by 100. Unknown: 7 by 100. New Mexico State: 4 by 100. Missouri: 6 by 90. Utah State: 2 by 100. BYU: 4 by 78.3. Air Force: 4 by 100. New Mexico: 7 by 100. Wyoming: 7 by 100. Colorado State: 2 by 76.7. TCU: 4 by 70. Utah: 12 by 85.6. UNLV: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins89.6 · n=8 · +8.6 vs Losses
Losses81 · n=4 · -8.6 vs Wins
First Half81.6 · n=7 · -26.6 vs Second Half
Second Half108.2 · n=6 · +26.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Wyoming
Best efficiency game
100 vs Navy
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/24 | vs Navy | W 35-14 | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 | 22.50 | 0 | 30 |
| Sun 11/28 | vs UNLV100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 48-14 | — | 6 | 128 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 2 | 50 |
| Sun 11/21 | vs Utah100 receiving yards · High volume | L 34-38 | — | 12 | 154 | 12.8 | 12.80 | 0 | 46 |
| Sat 11/13 | @ TCU | L 35-40 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sun 11/7 | vs Colorado State | W 24-19 | — | 2 | 23 | 8.3 | 11.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/30 | @ Wyoming100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 48-38 | — | 7 | 175 | 25 | 25 | 2 | 59 |
| Sun 10/24 | @ New Mexico100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 30-20 | — | 7 | 127 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 2 | 40 |
| Sun 10/17 | vs Air Force100 receiving yards | W 27-25 | — | 4 | 106 | 26.5 | 26.50 | 0 | 59 |
| Sat 10/9 | @ BYU | L 21-24 | — | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 11.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sun 9/26 | vs Utah State | W 41-7 | — | 2 | 40 | 13 | 20 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/18 | @ Missouri | L 24-27 | — | 6 | 81 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 9/12 | @ New Mexico State | W 41-21 | — | 4 | 73 | 14 | 18.30 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 9/5 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | — | — | 7 | 179 | 25.6 | 25.60 | 2 | 71 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
San Diego State
2005-2010
Opening stop
Season Progression
2005200620072008200920102010
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | San Diego State | 60 | 66.3 | 8 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | San Diego State | 0 | — | — | -60 |
| 2007 Regular Season | San Diego State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | San Diego State | 111 | 67.5 | 6.5 | 111 |
| 2009 Regular Season | San Diego State | 851 | 85 | 25.1 | 740 |
| 2010 Postseason | San Diego State | 1,220 | 92.4 | 27.3 | 369 |
| 2010 Regular Season | San Diego State | 1,220 | 92.4 | 27.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Colorado State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
257
Primary metric
257 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Wyoming
175
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
175 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
179
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
179 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
San José State
20
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
20 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
New Mexico
127
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2010 Postseason · San Diego State
1,220 primary output · 92.4 efficiency · 27.3 usage
70.3
#2
2010 Regular Season · San Diego State
70.3
1,220 primary · 92.4 efficiency · 27.3 usage
#3
2009 Regular Season · San Diego State
56.5
851 primary · 85 efficiency · 25.1 usage
Milestones
7
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2003 · Rating 0.9329
Parkview · Lilburn, GA
- Committed To
- Georgia
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2003
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
2,242
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 37 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.