Usage Score
37.3
Player Dossier
2006-2009Boston College
Rich Gunnell
WR • 5'11" • East Windsor, NJ, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Rich Gunnell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
77.2
Consistency
47.2
Season Value
65.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Boston College
0606070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Boston College
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rich Gunnell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Boston College. Rich Gunnell reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Boston College paired 931 primary output with 82.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 77.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Boston College
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
67.7
Efficiency
77.2
Usage
37.3
Consistency
47.2
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 130. Unknown: 0. Kent State: 114. Clemson: 0. Wake Forest: 51. Florida State: 47. Virginia Tech: 6. NC State: 42. Notre Dame: 179. Central Michigan: 134. Virginia: 75. North Carolina: 60. Maryland: 42
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 6 by 100. Kent State: 6 by 100. Wake Forest: 5 by 68. Florida State: 5 by 62.7. Virginia Tech: 1 by 40. NC State: 5 by 56. Notre Dame: 10 by 100. Central Michigan: 8 by 100. Virginia: 3 by 100. North Carolina: 6 by 66.7. Maryland: 5 by 56
Split Comparison
Wins72.1 · n=7 · -2.9 vs Losses
Losses75 · n=5 · +2.9 vs Wins
First Half49.7 · n=7 · -39.0 vs Second Half
Second Half88.7 · n=6 · +39.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/27 | @ USC100 receiving yards | L 13-24 | — | 6 | 130 | 21.7 | 21.70 | 1 | 61 |
| Sat 11/28 | @ Maryland | W 19-17 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs North Carolina | L 13-31 | — | 6 | 60 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Virginia | W 14-10 | — | 3 | 75 | 16 | 25 | 0 | 34 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Central Michigan100 receiving yards · High volume | W 31-10 | — | 8 | 134 | 15.2 | 16.80 | 1 | 41 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Notre Dame100 receiving yards · High volume | L 16-20 | — | 10 | 179 | 17.9 | 17.90 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs NC State | W 52-20 | — | 5 | 42 | 8.4 | 8.40 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Virginia Tech | L 14-48 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Florida State | W 28-21 | — | 5 | 47 | 9.4 | 9.40 | 1 | 14 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Wake Forest | W 27-24 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Clemson | L 7-25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Kent State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 34-7 | — | 6 | 114 | 19 | 19 | 2 | 44 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Boston College
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062006200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Boston College | 97 | 68.3 | 5 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Boston College | 97 | 68.3 | 5 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Boston College | 931 | 82.6 | 17.1 | 834 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Boston College | 931 | 82.6 | 17.1 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Boston College | 551 | 64.7 | 23.2 | -380 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Boston College | 551 | 64.7 | 23.2 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Boston College | 880 | 77.2 | 37.3 | 329 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Boston College | 880 | 77.2 | 37.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
179
Primary metric
179 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia Tech
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Miami
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan State
138
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
138 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Central Michigan
134
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Postseason · Boston College
931 primary output · 82.6 efficiency · 17.1 usage
65.5
#2
2007 Regular Season · Boston College
65.5
931 primary · 82.6 efficiency · 17.1 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Boston College
65.4
880 primary · 77.2 efficiency · 37.3 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2004 · Rating 0.7667
Timpview · Provo, UT
- Committed To
- Utah State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2004
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
2,459
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 47 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.