Usage Score
20
Player Profile
Andrew Brewer
WR • 6'3" • Tulsa, OK, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Andrew Brewer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
90
Consistency
67.4
Season Value
69.3
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Northwestern
060708080909
Quick Facts
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Primary stop by seasons
- Northwestern
- Best season by value score
- Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Northwestern
- Peak game by takeover score
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Andrew Brewer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Northwestern. Andrew Brewer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Northwestern paired 925 primary output with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 90 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Northwestern
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
77.1
Efficiency
90
Usage
20
Consistency
67.4
Best Game by takeover score
Auburn
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 133. Unknown: 145. Eastern Michigan: 18. Syracuse: 73. Minnesota: 44. Miami (OH): 0. Michigan State: 104. Indiana: 135. Penn State: 65. Iowa: 33. Illinois: 73. Wisconsin: 102
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 8 by 100. Unknown: 6 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 60. Syracuse: 4 by 100. Minnesota: 3 by 97.8. Michigan State: 8 by 86.7. Indiana: 8 by 100. Penn State: 6 by 72.2. Iowa: 3 by 73.3. Illinois: 3 by 100. Wisconsin: 6 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins60.2 · n=6 · -23.6 vs Losses
Losses83.8 · n=5 · +23.6 vs Wins
First Half68.8 · n=6 · -16.5 vs Second Half
Second Half85.3 · n=6 · +16.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
100 vs Auburn
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | @ Auburn100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-38 | — | 8 | 133 | 16.6 | 16.60 | 2 | 39 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Wisconsin100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 33-31 | — | 6 | 102 | 17 | 17 | 2 | 34 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Illinois | W 21-16 | — | 3 | 73 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 0 | 52 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ Iowa | W 17-10 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Penn State | L 13-34 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs Indiana100 receiving yards · High volume | W 29-28 | — | 8 | 135 | 16.9 | 16.90 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Michigan State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-24 | — | 8 | 104 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Miami (OH) | W 16-6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Minnesota | L 24-35 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Syracuse | L 34-37 | — | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 27-24 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 6 | 145 | 24.2 | 24.20 | 1 | 72 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northwestern
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
200620072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Northwestern | 48 | 100 | 5.3 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | -48 |
| 2008 Postseason | Northwestern | 145 | 61.6 | 12.4 | 145 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Northwestern | 145 | 61.6 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Northwestern | 925 | 90 | 20 | 780 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Northwestern | 925 | 90 | 20 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
145
Primary metric
145 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Indiana
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Auburn
133
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Iowa
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Wisconsin
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Northwestern
925 primary output · 90 efficiency · 20 usage
69.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Northwestern
69.3
925 primary · 90 efficiency · 20 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Northwestern
36.1
145 primary · 61.6 efficiency · 12.4 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2004 · Rating 0.7667
La Marque · La Marque, TX
- Committed To
- Utah
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2004
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
1,118
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Career Metric Focus
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.