Usage Score
—
Player Profile
—
Darius Walker shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
75.7
Career Arc
Season-by-season value trend
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Notre Dame
Quick Facts
Darius Walker, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Notre Dame. Darius Walker shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Notre Dame paired 11 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Army
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
0.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. LSU: 0. Georgia Tech: 1. Penn State: 1. Michigan: 0. Michigan State: 0. Purdue: 1. Stanford: 1. UCLA: 0. Navy: 0. North Carolina: 1. Air Force: 1. Army: 2. USC: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Army
Best efficiency game
— vs LSU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/4 | @ LSU | L 14-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 128 | 5.80 | 0 | 35 |
| Sun 11/26 | @ USC | L 24-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 56 | 4 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Army | W 41-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 162 | 6.80 | 2 | 22 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Air Force | W 39-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 153 | 10.20 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs North Carolina | W 45-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 86 | 4.30 | 1 | 12 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Navy | W 38-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 103 | 5.20 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs UCLA | W 20-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 53 | 2.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Stanford | W 31-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25 | 153 | 6.10 | 1 | 32 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Purdue | W 35-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31 | 146 | 4.70 | 1 | 14 |
| Sun 9/24 | @ Michigan State | W 40-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 47 | 4.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Michigan | L 21-47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 25 | 2.50 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Penn State | W 41-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 56 | 2.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/3 | @ Georgia Tech | W 14-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 99 | 4.50 | 1 | 19 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Notre Dame
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 7 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 11 | — | — | 4 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Notre Dame | 8 | — | — | -3 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Ohio State
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
Army
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Pittsburgh
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Notre Dame
11 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
78.8
#2
2006 Regular Season · Notre Dame
75.7
8 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2004 Regular Season · Notre Dame
57.6
7 primary · — efficiency · — usage
5
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2007 · Rating 0.9417
Canton South · Canton, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 36 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Switch the career lens without tearing down the page.
Darius Walker quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit