Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2007Mississippi State
—
Brandon Thornton shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
4.2
Season Value
52.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Mississippi State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Brandon Thornton, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Mississippi State. Brandon Thornton shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Mississippi State paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2007 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, UAB.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Memphis
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
0.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
4.2
Best Game by takeover score
Memphis
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. Tulsa: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Houston: 0. East Carolina: 0. Southern Miss: 0. UCF: 0. Memphis: 1
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
8 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Memphis
Best efficiency game
— vs Memphis
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/17 | @ Memphis | L 9-25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 11/11 | vs UCF | L 31-45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 47 | 5.90 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Southern Miss | L 7-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 0.80 | 0 | 3 |
| Sat 10/27 | @ East Carolina | L 6-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 67 | 5.60 | 0 | 35 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Houston | L 10-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 16 | 5.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Mississippi State | L 13-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 34 | 4.30 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Tulsa | L 30-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 89 | 4.20 | 0 | 12 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Mississippi State
2005-2006
Opening stop
UAB
2007
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 2 | — | — | 1 |
| 2007 Regular Season | UAB | 1 | — | — | -1 |
#1 Featured game
Kentucky
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Unknown
2
Primary metric
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Memphis
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Ole Miss
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Arkansas
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Mississippi State
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
52.4
#2
2007 Regular Season · UAB
52.1
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2005 Regular Season · Mississippi State
51.9
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7
Helix · La Mesa, CA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Brandon Thornton quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit