Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2008Purdue
Kory Sheets
—
Impact contributor
Kory Sheets shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
53.8
Season Value
76.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Purdue
05060708
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Purdue
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kory Sheets, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Purdue. Kory Sheets shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Purdue paired 13 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2008 Regular Season · Purdue
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
1.4
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
53.8
Best Game by takeover score
Indiana
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 2. Oregon: 2. Central Michigan: 2. Notre Dame: 1. Penn State: 1. Ohio State: 0. Northwestern: 2. Minnesota: 0. Michigan: 4. Michigan State: 0. Iowa: 0. Indiana: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins75 · n=3 · +2.3 vs Losses
Losses18.8 · n=8 · -2.3 vs Wins
First Half33.3 · n=6 · -0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half37.5 · n=6 · +0.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Indiana
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | vs Indiana | W 62-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 15 | 61 | 4.10 | 3 | 17 |
| Sat 11/15 | @ Iowa | L 17-22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 53 | 3.30 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 11/8 | @ Michigan State | L 7-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 93 | 4.20 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/1 | vs Michigan | W 48-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 118 | 3.90 | 3 | 18 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Minnesota | L 6-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 73 | 3.50 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Northwestern | L 26-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 168 | 9.90 | 2 | 76 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Ohio State | L 3-16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 67 | 3.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/4 | vs Penn State | L 6-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 59 | 3.30 | 1 | 19 |
| Sat 9/27 | @ Notre Dame | L 21-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13 | 87 | 6.70 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 9/20 | vs Central Michigan | W 32-25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 91 | 5.40 | 2 | 46 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Oregon | L 26-32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 29 | 180 | 6.20 | 2 | 80 |
| Sat 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 81 | 5.10 | 2 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Purdue
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
2005200620072008
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Purdue | 10 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Purdue | 13 | — | — | 3 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Purdue | 13 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Purdue | 17 | — | — | 4 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Miami (OH)
4
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
4 primary-metric impact.
#3
Central Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Indiana
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Michigan State
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Purdue
13 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
79
#2
2005 Regular Season · Purdue
77.5
10 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Purdue
76.9
17 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
12
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2008 · Rating 0.7667
Crespi · Encino, CA
- Committed To
- Arizona
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2008
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 50 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.