Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Player Dossier
2004-2005SMU
—
Jerad Romo shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
Reliability
65
Reliable weekly contributor
Star Power
77
High-upside career profile
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · SMU
Snapshot
Jerad Romo, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · SMU. Jerad Romo shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | SMU | 9 | 0 | 9 | 76.1 |
| 2005 Regular Season | SMU | 10 | 0 | 11 | 82.6 |
Related Context
Jerad Romo is listed for SMU. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
SMU paired 11 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2005 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
1.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
65.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 1. TCU: 1. Texas A&M: 1. Tulane: 0. Marshall: 1. UAB: 2. East Carolina: 1. Tulsa: 0. Rice: 1. UTEP: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
— vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 40-27 | 18 | 32 | 211 | 56.3 | 3 | 0 | — | 6 | 27 | 4.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Rice | W 27-7 | 9 | 17 | 111 | 52.9 | 0 | 0 | — | 8 | 51 | 6.40 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Tulsa | L 13-20 | 20 | 32 | 223 | 62.5 | 0 | 1 | — | 7 | -5 | -0.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs East Carolina | L 17-24 | 19 | 37 | 211 | 51.4 | 0 | 4 | — | 8 | 6 | 0.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UAB | W 28-27 | 30 | 43 | 333 | 69.8 | 2 | 0 | — | 10 | -18 | -1.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Marshall | L 13-16 | 10 | 22 | 151 | 45.5 | 1 | 0 | — | 11 | 7 | 0.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Tulane | L 10-31 | 4 | 11 | 25 | 36.4 | 0 | 0 | — | 13 | -24 | -1.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Texas A&M | L 8-66 | 18 | 31 | 243 | 58.1 | 1 | 1 | — | 8 | -1 | -0.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs TCU | W 21-10 | 11 | 21 | 101 | 52.4 | 1 | 0 | — | 13 | 48 | 3.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Baylor | L 23-28 | 3 | 8 | 42 | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | — | 14 | 82 | 5.90 | 1 | 21 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
SMU
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | SMU | 9 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | SMU | 11 | — | — | 2 |
#1 Featured game
@ UTEP
Week 13 · L 27-57 · Conference game
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
vs San José State
Week 5 · W 36-13 · Conference game
2
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
vs UTEP
Week 13 · W 40-27 · Conference game
3
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
@ UAB
Week 6 · W 28-27 · Conference game
2
Touchdowns
66.7 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
vs Nevada
Week 12 · W 38-20 · Conference game
1
Touchdowns
50 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · SMU
11 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
82.6
#2
2004 Regular Season · SMU
76.1
9 primary · — efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.