Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005SMU
Jerad Romo
—
Impact contributor
Jerad Romo shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
65.1
Season Value
82.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · SMU
0405
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jerad Romo, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · SMU. Jerad Romo shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
SMU paired 9 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2005 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · SMU
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
1.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
65.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTEP
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 1. TCU: 1. Texas A&M: 1. Tulane: 0. Marshall: 1. UAB: 2. East Carolina: 1. Tulsa: 0. Rice: 1. UTEP: 3
Volume vs Efficiency
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Wins58.3 · n=4 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses22.2 · n=6 · -1.1 vs Wins
First Half26.6 · n=5 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half46.7 · n=5 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
— vs UTEP
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/26 | vs UTEP | W 40-27 | 18 | 32 | 211 | 56.3 | 3 | 0 | — | 6 | 27 | 4.50 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Rice | W 27-7 | 9 | 17 | 111 | 52.9 | 0 | 0 | — | 8 | 51 | 6.40 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Tulsa | L 13-20 | 20 | 32 | 223 | 62.5 | 0 | 1 | — | 7 | -5 | -0.70 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs East Carolina | L 17-24 | 19 | 37 | 211 | 51.4 | 0 | 4 | — | 8 | 6 | 0.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ UAB | W 28-27 | 30 | 43 | 333 | 69.8 | 2 | 0 | — | 10 | -18 | -1.80 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Marshall | L 13-16 | 10 | 22 | 151 | 45.5 | 1 | 0 | — | 11 | 7 | 0.60 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Tulane | L 10-31 | 4 | 11 | 25 | 36.4 | 0 | 0 | — | 13 | -24 | -1.80 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Texas A&M | L 8-66 | 18 | 31 | 243 | 58.1 | 1 | 1 | — | 8 | -1 | -0.10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sun 9/11 | vs TCU | W 21-10 | 11 | 21 | 101 | 52.4 | 1 | 0 | — | 13 | 48 | 3.70 | 0 | 12 |
| Sun 9/4 | vs Baylor | L 23-28 | 3 | 8 | 42 | 37.5 | 0 | 0 | — | 14 | 82 | 5.90 | 1 | 21 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
20042005
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | SMU | 9 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | SMU | 11 | — | — | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
San José State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
UTEP
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#4
UAB
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Nevada
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · SMU
9 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
85.2
#2
2005 Regular Season · SMU
82.6
11 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9642
West Springfield · Springfield, VA
- Committed To
- North Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 19 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.