Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Temple
—
Tim Brown shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
55.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Temple
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Tim Brown, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Temple. Tim Brown shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Temple paired 3 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2006 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Navy
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 0. Louisville: 0. Vanderbilt: 1. Kent State: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Central Michigan: 1. Penn State: 0. Navy: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Navy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ Navy | L 6-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Penn State | L 0-47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 21 | 1.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Central Michigan | L 26-42 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | — | 23 | 101 | 4.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Bowling Green | W 28-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 104 | 5 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Northern Illinois | L 21-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 23 | 1.90 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Kent State | L 17-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 76 | 6.30 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Vanderbilt | L 14-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31 | 147 | 4.70 | 1 | 78 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Louisville | L 0-62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 32 | 2.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Thu 8/31 | @ Buffalo | L 3-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 82 | 4.10 | 0 | 15 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Temple
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Temple | 3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 3 | — | — | 3 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Bowling Green
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Central Michigan
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Kent State
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Temple
3 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
55.6
#2
2006 Regular Season · Temple
55.6
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2005 Regular Season · Temple
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2010 · Rating 0.8233
Mountain Pointe · Phoenix, AZ
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Tim Brown quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit