Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2007Ole Miss
—
Seth Adams shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
75.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Ole Miss
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Seth Adams, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Ole Miss. Seth Adams shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Ole Miss paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2007 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
1.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Memphis: 1. Missouri: 3. Vanderbilt: 1. Florida: 2. Georgia: 1. Louisiana Tech: 2. Alabama: 3. Arkansas: 0. Auburn: 0. Unknown: 0. LSU: 0
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
— vs LSU
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/17 | vs LSU | L 24-41 | 4 | 11 | 57 | 36.4 | 0 | 1 | — | 2 | 1 | 0.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 15 | 113 | 46.7 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Auburn | L 3-17 | 11 | 24 | 89 | 45.8 | 0 | 0 | — | 6 | -8 | -1.30 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Arkansas | L 8-44 | 9 | 21 | 79 | 42.9 | 0 | 4 | — | 8 | -2 | -0.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Alabama | L 24-27 | 22 | 40 | 284 | 55.0 | 2 | 3 | — | 7 | -11 | -1.60 | 1 | 4 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 24-0 | 16 | 32 | 167 | 50.0 | 2 | 3 | — | 4 | -5 | -1.30 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Georgia | L 17-45 | 24 | 35 | 228 | 68.6 | 1 | 1 | — | 4 | 6 | 1.50 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Florida | L 24-30 | 18 | 31 | 302 | 58.1 | 2 | 1 | — | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Vanderbilt | L 17-31 | 10 | 17 | 154 | 58.8 | 1 | 1 | — | 6 | -5 | -0.80 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Missouri | L 25-38 | 23 | 41 | 305 | 56.1 | 3 | 1 | — | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Memphis | W 23-21 | 19 | 30 | 201 | 63.3 | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | -7 | -2.30 | 0 | 2 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ole Miss
2006-2007
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Ole Miss | 13 | — | — | 13 |
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Missouri
3
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
Louisiana Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Florida
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Georgia
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Ole Miss
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2007 Regular Season · Ole Miss
75.7
13 primary · — efficiency · — usage
4
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2011 · Rating 0.7383
St. Thomas Aquinas · Fort Lauderdale, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 17 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Seth Adams quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit